This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen
^Image\ from^ ^this\ article^
Fair. And I do believe that the party cohesion is indeed a very weak point, with the admission of questionable and figures is a huge drawback.
But when I hear talk of a revolution, and specially that only violent revolutions have been successful, I don't know if I feel like that applies to the current state in Mexico. Any reads that you might recommend?
I mean the movement can fall apart any time, this so called 21st century socialism has been a failure everywhere in latin america so far, most recent collapse is Bolivia.
Bolivia with Evo?
And I guess you're right, regarding the dire situation in south America.
I'd of course just hope that enough traction can be gained from international unity for a multipolar world alongside BRICS, or something new from south America. As to at least avoid the domestic armed struggle.