Interesting. Maybe they will have to start proactively surveying mass amounts of people instead of relying on free internet social media.
I don't understand the appeal of AI for most things. The amount of incorrect information it gives is already too high making it unreliable. The benefit seems to be with brainstorming ideas or dealing with fiction.
I don't understand the full picture here, but the person who is submitting AI slop will be held accountable. Never a company.
So if a company is pushing staff to us AI to complete projects faster and their code ends up being AI slop when submitted, only the person working for the company will be held responsible.
I'm not sure what the repercussions are here but hopefully it's not a large fine. Those fines could add up quick if the person is submitting code all the time and doesn't know they are messing up.
Do you know how they planned to fix the problem?
Good point. I did assume it would only get sold once.
I can't help but to feel like this is happening with all AI. Social media comments from Facebook, Reddit, X etc are low effort and flushed out with bots.
I think you're being naive. Nobody can embarrass/piss off a world power then think their safe because they aren't a citizen of that county.
China recently passed an amendment to their Cybersecurity law giving them more power to go after international hackers like this.
China could pay someone to track down the hacker and catch or kill them. I think they have a part of their government for that actually. Maybe they quietly put a bounty on their head. How is china going to prevent this person from continuing to hack them or teach others how to do it? This is a serious problem for whoever hacked them.
What's crazy is the hacker is trying to sell extremely classified Chinese defense information for only 'hundreds of thousands of dollars in crypto'. You can get a preview for 'thousands of dollars'.
Is it worth placing a huge target on yourself for less than a million dollars? It's unfortunate I will never read a follow-up on this story.
No way in hell I would want to go to the moon nowadays. Technology these days is like having two left feet. Especially if AI is involved.
What Google is accomplishing with this change is tighter control of their results.
This is disappointing and only serves the interest of Google.
There is little value in AI for the average person. AI over promises and under delivers. It's a fun toy for 10 minutes but you quickly see its incompetence. Once the wow factor wears off it becomes annoying.
I would like to know why these investors thought gamers would be excited for AI to make their games??? I would probably have to read the AI written article to find that out though.
Ah okay got it now. Thanks. I didn't understand it all the way. My comment is irrelevant