NewSocialWhoDis

joined 1 month ago
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You may be speaking for some independent or folks who frequently caucus with the Democrats, but you ain't speaking for the mother in the video. She repeatedly mentions how much she likes what Trump is doing 'on the border'.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Disgusting woman, torn between her daughter having food to eat and the stellar job she thinks Trump is doing rounding up brown people.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As a Trump-hating American working in defense, I always tried to tell people that our economic dominance was enforced with the barrel of a gun. Friends working in international relations would also reference books like "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" that also pointed to usage of the CIA and international lending terms to enrich ourselves at the expanse of the 3rd world, especially Latin America. I completely agree that a capricious, bi-polar US is an untenable world leader.

But in general, it's very hard to get most Americans to care about our relationships and interactions with the rest of the world, much less acknowledge the ways we are dependent on it. There is some US-centric vanity involved, as well as some stubborn ignorance due to never interacting with the rest of the world at all. But I think in part it's also due to the hyper competitive nature of simply trying to live in the US, such that there is no brainspace for anything not directly affecting you. Stressors include corporate expectations that everyone should live to work, so many people a few paychecks away from losing their homes and lifestyle with no social safety net, the struggle to afford to live in areas with good schools for your kids, etc etc. In some ways, I'm hopeful that losing global pre-eminence could make life easier for us, especially if it brings about government reform (I don't mean the MAGA version of this, obviously).

China, the obvious successor to American influence, assuming a more commanding role on the world stage is a mixed bag. On one hand, they certainly prize stability above almost everything, and an authoritarian state run by technocrats indeed seems more effective at addressing climate change than a Corporatocracy that profits from destroying the planet. On the other, there's not even acknowledgement of unethical practices (e.g.: labor conditions in Chinese companies in DRC, Zambia, and Zimbabwe) when there is no free press. As the US spread it's influence and democracy after WWII, I kind of worry that the entire world may be forced to get in line with the CCP.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Look, as an American, all I'm asking for is a little extrajudicial redition of Musk and Thiel by South Africa. If we could just get rid of some of the malevolent billionaires that have made the pilgrimage to the land of greed, we might stand a chance of holding on to some of our civil liberties.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Don't you worry. Civil War is still on the horizon. Gotta see how 2026 goes.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

As a parent: happiness is about expectations. The exhuberance of youth can carry them as long as we aren't preparing them for the halcyon, easy days of the 1990s. Life will be hard, it always has been, but there can still be fun and rewarding experiences. They need to know resilience, independence, and be quick on their feet both mentally and physically.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are many Great Filters, but this one is mine (ours).

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't see why we have to contrast the US and China so that one is a good guy and one is a bad guy. Has the US exploited the rest of the world since WWII for our own financial interests? Yes. Do we have an increasingly authoritarian government seeking to eventually crush internal dissent? Yes.

None of that makes China good.

If you don't want to talk about Tiananmen Square, talk about China forcefully relocated migrant workers ahead of the Olympics in 2008. Talk about China sending Uyghurs to reeducation camps and forcefully sterilizing some of them. Talk about how China forced women to abandon/ abort babies for 30 years throughout vast swaths of their country. Talk about how people residing in China can't actually talk about any of these things, to the point where citizens of Hong Kong fought back with violent protests and many fled to resist their encroaching authoritarian hand.

Did China raise more than a billion people out of brutal poverty in a single generation, and was it one of the most impressive and important developments of the last century? Yes, absolutely. Is an authoritarian technocracy better able to deal with the issues facing humanity in the near future like climate change? Potentially.

That doesn't mean China's citizens enjoy civil liberties.