gravitywell

joined 2 years ago
[–] gravitywell@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Why is it not mounted on the host/cointainer? I dont think you are using jellyfin "wrong" but its not like you cant just configure a mount point if you wanted to use jellyfin with it.

That is an interesting thing to point out though, im not actually sure but i think they used to support smb shares directly, i might just be thinking of kodi though.

[–] gravitywell@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think ACL is a paid feature with TS, but maybe im wrong. Once you get to the paid tier, you are just paying someone else to manage your VPN, which is fair enough but its not something you could't also pay someone to do with wireguard (or openVPN for that matter). I think its fair to say "I pay for this service because i don't want to have to deal with configuring it myself", it might be easier to setup for some use cases, but if someone is already self-hosting things and has a DIY attitude to it, I don't think tailscale can do anything wireguard can't also do (it is based on WG afterall)

Maybe I'm not familiar enough with other kinds of setups to think of things though. My wireguard setup is basically a meshnet between several people's home servers, each person has their own subnet only they can use, but the wider 10.X.X.X is shared by everyone, its certainly not the most secure because it doesnt need to be, but if i wanted to restrict one persons access to something i certainly could do that.

[–] gravitywell@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

Except you do need to acquire an online server somewhere, its just one that tailscale owns and controls instead of you, and when tailscale decides to enshittify and kill of their free tier you'll be left wondering why you didn't just rent a cheap VPS sooner.

Ask yourself, what is tailscale getting out of those "free" users that makes it worth providing services to them that they'd otherwsie need to rent a VPS for? What do you think their response would be if for example they got pressured about maybe too many users on their network are running a certain video streaming app?

[–] gravitywell@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I'm curious what kind of a use case you can think of that "traditional wireguard" can't replace tailscale for.

Tailscale has a maximum of 3 users on their free tier, so it seems like a super limited use case of people who DIY their own servers for Jellyfin or HomAssistant or whatever, but just a tad too lazy to setup their own Wireguard service in addition to whatever it is they'd be using it for... I think the vast majority of free tailscale users have simply never actually tried wg-easy , because if they did they wouldnt need to use a third party service.

[–] gravitywell@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (16 children)

Just use normal wireguard, why do you need tails or heads at all?