kippininreal

joined 2 months ago
[–] kippininreal@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely, thanks! I got this (crucial?) detail missed, that the two aren't independent but AI overviews cannibalizing traditional ads both losing money.

[–] kippininreal@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They are making less off of AI overviews than traditional ads, but their AI buildout costs are increasing, which is ass backwards. I don't know if it was in their report but they also supposedly don't have a strategy for making their customers pay for AI use.

[–] kippininreal@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They revealed that they make less money on the AI Overview than traditional ads. Also they, supposedly, have no strategy to monetize AI use from their customers.

[–] kippininreal@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Genuinely asking: if I buy a game (aka "license to play") on steam, is it morally ok to acquire the same on the high seas? I assume The devs got paid when I paid steam?

[–] kippininreal@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Halo ~~VI~~ IIIIII

Who understands Roman numbering anyways

[–] kippininreal@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

What a terrible headline! It isn't misleading for clickbait, it's just... inconsequential. The headline belies the main point of Broche's thinking:

Rather than pleasing an imaginary audience, Broche reveals that development on Clair Obscur was focused on satisfying the developers.