I was under the impression that even clearly drawn it's already illegal, though it's a grey area since they can say "lol it's a 1000 year old demon that just looks like a child." Is that not the case?
raptir
joined 2 years ago
Yeah it seems like they use different "chunks" so I don't think it would be cross compatible.
I wish there was some way to share the assets since they use the same base data. I use osmand because I find it better for hiking and route planning to send to my watch, but would use organic as well if I I didn't need to keep two copies of the maps.
Two of the ads are for the same company, and that company is also one of the two organic results.
Nah just the white house.
"Hispanic man questions supporting an administration that ~~doesnt support hispanics~~ explicitly targets hispanics."
Ftfy.
I'm honestly shocked you still have a job.
Heck, you could probably be charged with some sort of crime for helping people with disabilities.
That's interesting and led me down a wikipedia rabbit hole. So the law in the US says that fictional child pornography (i.e., where it is drawn and this is not "indistinguishable" from a minor) is illegal if it is "obscene." And the definition of "obscene" essentially comes down to "would the average member of the community find it offensive."
That takes "grey area" to a whole new level.