this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
875 points (99.7% liked)
Technology
89678 readers
4438 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Artificial static throughput caps on modern networks are asinine and archaic, especially on shared mediums.
Network providers should permit shared best effort throughput, with a sliding temporal window which keeps a tally of usage and feeds into a ratcheting deprioritisation of slot allocations. This would permit short bursts of maximum throughput, which is more efficient and frees the channel quicker, and slots longer transfers into the remaining default channel space.
Differentiate service based on the dimensions of the monitored and enforced windows, not an arbitrary static sphincter.
How would you explain that in a simple way people can understanding?
Basicslly the more data you use, the lower priority you are
So the person browsing the Web doesn't get slowed down by the person redownloading their entire steam library, but if there's bandwidth for everyone then they all go full speed
The downside is some heavier services need to be as fast as possible for good service, like video calls, while you're not going to really notice if your game takes another 2 minutes to download (and this is the way stuff is prioritized now by default)
You could split the difference, but it doesn't really fix the problem, it just fixes the data limiting nonsense. And we should just make that flatly illegal
Really, they should only be able to sell 50mb/s service if their network can provide that to all of their users on at any point in any average day.
So when GTA6 releases, maybe it's a bit of a slow Internet day, but if they can't provide what they promised every evening when everyone is streaming TV?
Then they need to start giving people some of their money back. That way they'll make sure to upgrade their network proactively
there's actually tools for this I think. packets can designate priority. I think its called Quality Of Service. for example e-mails and your 'civilization' turn say 'don't worry, slip me in when you have a free millisecond, I can wait a minute if you're really fucking impacted', streaming video and other suff with some leeway says 'I got a schedule here' and calls or your 'call of battle strike' game where the thing is badically useless if its late cut to the front of the line.
not every router implements it, and that's fine. unless I just imagined all if this. its been a while, but the people who designed the bones of the internet were smart and forward thinking. for example the problems with address space and stuff ipv6 was implemented to solve was finalized in the 90s. the corporations hadn't ruined everything yet.
You're correct, like I said that's the default. A home router might not have it, but basically every commercial piece of network gear has had it for decades now. It was basically required for things like VOIP back in the day, so it became very standard