this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
669 points (98.3% liked)

memes

22417 readers
2514 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

It means it gives the illusion of being locked, until an Israeli tech company plugs into it and unlocks it for the cops.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-tech-company-says-it-can-break-into-all-iphones-ever-made-some-androids/

[–] axh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

For me, personally.. it means able to be unlocked. If I want to say the other thing, I say "it doesn't lock."

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

*None-lockable

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure one of those has a hyphen

[–] Tacky4092@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You are able to undo the locking. It's almost like reading comprehension is shit nowadays.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigBrownBeaver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Now I'm trying to think of a circumstance where something can be unlocked but not relocked. Like in a game you can just make a new account and achievements are relocked.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why would unlockable mean able to be unlocked?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] modus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you can't unlock it, is it really a lock?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VenusianMars@cupoftea.social 2 points 1 week ago

@The_Picard_Maneuver You know we are... every rule gets a 'but maybe', 'except for when', 'never mind, nothing means what you think and everything means something AND nothing at all but also whatever you want it to mean.'

[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing is unlockable with the right epoxy.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Or with enough epoxy.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think I've ever used the word "unlockable".

"The closet doors in my house don't have locks", is probably what I'd say.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wieson@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Can we discern via stress?
UNlockable - can be opened.
unLOCKable - cannot be locked

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unlockable = can’t be locked

Unopenable = can’t be opened

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Awe that's cute, trying to apply consistency across English words

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's not about openability, it's about lockability. A container could unopenable without being lockable.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Locks should always be able to be reversed. Locking something is restricting access, not denying it entirely. You don't weld a door shut and call it locked.

Poe didn't write a tale about Fortunato being locked downstairs.

"Sealed", "buried", "entombed", "immured" - all perfectly good terms for closing access to something with the intent of the closure being permanent.

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yep. Language can be funny like that. You are either modifying the adjective "lockable" with the prefix "un-", or you are modifying the verb "unlock" into an adjective by adding "-able" at the end. Words can have multiple definitions, yay!

[–] Skymt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Both definitions refer to the same thing, right? A locked lock is unlockable. It cannot be locked further, AND it can be unlocked.

Vice versa for the unlocked lock.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I would say "un" implies a reversal of some state. More clear would be "not lockable", so most people would use this. Unlockable is much more likely to mean able to reverse the state of being locked.

[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

both, but not at the same time. words change meaning with context. thats why there often are several definitions of a single word.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Back in like 1st or 2nd grade the teacher introduced us to context clues for reading comprehension.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's the same thing with “unsweet,” which has apparently become the universal term at food establishments when you want unsweetened tea. I’m in the American South, so I encounter this constantly.

But what the hell is “unsweet”? What does that even mean? Did they sweeten it and then somehow take the sweetness back out? Was it accomplished through evaporation? Reverse osmosis? Some sort of industrial-scale anti-sugar process?

“Unsweet” isn't a word.

So when I order, I specifically say, “unsweetened tea,” and the server inevitably responds, “Unsweet?”

“Gotcha.”

No. You got nothing. I said unsweetened.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Words are often shortened. It reduces the number of vowels and makes communication quicker and easier. Do you also have an issue with these?:

math
gym
bike
fridge
TV
ad
lab
info
photo

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›