this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
520 points (99.8% liked)

Privacy

51538 readers
656 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When a Department of Homeland Security official sent out an alert to stop Samuel Tunick, a Stop Cop City activist, at an airport in January 2025, they said the reason was because he was suspected of “terrorist activities,” according to new filed court records which include a screenshot of the alert and photos of Tunick’s interrogation.

Tunick ultimately provided Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials with a code that, when entered, wiped his security- and privacy-focused GrapheneOS phone. Tunick is now being criminally charged for that alleged act, in one of the most high profile technology civil rights cases in recent memory.

The court records also showed that CBP officials lied to Tunick during his interrogation. Instead of saying he was being targeted for suspected terrorism — although this search happened just at the start of the second Trump administration, it has dramatically broadened what organizations or people may be considered such — they said they needed his phone to look for “kiddie porn.”

“Good afternoon,” an email sent from a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) official, part of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), to CBP and other officials reads. “The following subject is scheduled to arrive in ATL [Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport] today via DL 1778 @ 1930 Hours. TUNICK is under investigation by HSI/JTTF for suspected terrorist activities.” The email includes a photo of Tunick, and asks the officials to direct him to secondary inspection, retain all of his electronics, and collect their passcodes.

As 404 Media first revealed in December, Tunick was charged because he allegedly “did knowingly destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, and otherwise take any action to delete the digital contents of a Google Pixel cellular phone, for the purpose of preventing and impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take said property into its custody and control.” Matthew Dodge, one of Tunick’s lawyers, previously told 404 Media he only found one other case using the same obscure law, a drug trafficking case. “This is extraordinarily rare,” Dodge said.

Tunick was part of the Stop Cop City movement in Atlanta, which broadly protested the building of a large police training center, and which authorities investigated for arson, vandalism, and doxing. Tunick is not suspected of any crime beyond the alleged wiping of the phone, and has previously put his current prosecution in the context of the wide spanning cases against other Stop Cop City protesters.

The newly filed court record, in which Tunick’s lawyers argue that evidence should be thrown out, include new photos and descriptions of the airport encounter. The CBP officials asked Tunick if they were going to find “kiddie porn” on his phone, which Tunick immediately denied. “As the evidentiary hearing made clear, these unfounded accusations were nothing more than pretext for a fishing expedition into the depths of Mr. Tunick’s devices,” the lawyers wrote. They added, “Officer Findley acknowledged that officers had no reason whatsoever to believe Mr. Tunick possessed child pornography,” referring to one of the officials.

Tunick faces a maximum of five years in federal prison for allegedly wiping the phone.

“I hope people understand that the charges against me are meant to intimidate people against protecting their data and their privacy, and the government hopes to set a precedent that no one has the right to privacy,” Tunick previously told 404 Media.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

As I recall the law they're trying to get him on for giving them a duress password doesn't even reply to data, and requires a physical act, not a verbal one. It's the stretch of a stretch.

I hope the defense points out that the agency almost certainly had other means of accessing data on a phone other than using a password. Never mind that they had no reason to believe that his password was accurate.

If they had said to him "unlock your phone," and he entered the duress password, that might fly. But they didn't. They took his phone, asked him what the password was, and entered it. So technically they did the act.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You were warned long ago, these CP laws will be used to take a lot of people down, just like the drug laws, they all have the same purpose, though different targets.

Every time the government is granted powers, it abuses them. It's in their nature, they can't help it, they are after all people.

That's why transparency is so very important.

You are always a "suspect" for something, and CP is perfect for them to abuse because almost everybody has a phone full of photos, so they always have a "reason" to search your phone. This guy didn't do a goddamn thing.

These cops won't miss a day, and if they do, it will be paid for by us. We don't get to search their phones womp womp

I don't know what the solution is. I think that cops should have to pay the price for abusing our laws, that would be a good start.

[–] 0verthi@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

surprise 🤡

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

These child fuckers are now falsely accusing others of child abuse? Why is this not surprising?

Send all these fucking traitors to the camps they keep populating with innocent people.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Why is this not surprising?

Because projection has been their go-to #1 strategy for every single fucking thing for over a decade?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

'We searched the hard drive for drugs. No reason, didn't find shit - but by god, we searched!'

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

'wait til you see the stuff jimbob copied off!!!'

[–] f3nyx@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 hours ago

"Officer Findley acknowledged that officers had no reason whatsoever to believe Mr. Tunick possessed child pornography"

I'm pretty sure if I made up a lie at work I'd get fired. seems to be a requirement for law enforcement

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago

Isn’t this slander?

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is happening in GA, the state. He participated in "stop cop city" an anti-police thing. Unless he has a very good lawyer they will put him in prison for anything they can.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

They've already murdered one protestor.

[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This is something I've been saying for a while.

The right constantly fearmongers about pedophiles because CSAM is a really easy tool to frame someone. It's a crime that requires minimal evidence and creates significant disgust.

Expect more of this.

[–] lenabee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 11 hours ago

And yet the Epstein files go unaddressed. They know their base will one day eat them alive if allowed so they claw for power to avoid the consequences.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Remember Assange, ie this could happen in any of the Five Eyes.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Put the officers in jail. It’s that easy

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 8 points 14 hours ago

That's badass. Anyway, we need the second code to also be transparent

[–] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

So I guess this boils down to wether it was a "lawful authority to take custody and control". Do they actually need any clear indication for suspecting some crime?

[–] omghi@thelemmy.club 13 points 18 hours ago

daamn. they would do that...

[–] mefisdo_dot_info@lemmy.ca 46 points 23 hours ago (15 children)

So, GrapheneOS should have a function that replaces the content of the phone with a vanilla set of apps and a clean account, instead of wiping it, on receiving the distress code.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No, we need to keep a crumpled post-it note with the wipe password written on it in our pockets.

It's the police's fault for just typing in the unlabeled code they found. We use our actual passwords all the time - why would we have to keep those written down?

[–] KeithD@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 hour ago

Keep the duress code written down on a piece of paper in the phone case, under the phone.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

GOS developer already said this would be trivial to crack and notice the fake account. It would be a pointless solution that fools nobody.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Wiping it in the background behind the fake account, on the other hand, would be nontrivial to notice in time. And once it's wiped, what evidence is there that it wasn't already blank?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

You are proposing a technological workaround to fascism instead of a political actual solution. You see how that's hardly fucking helpful, right?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] alottafagina@lemmy.ml 102 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Called bullshit as soon as I read they were accusing him of kiddie stuff.

This is why GrapheneOS's passcode feature is more likely to land you in trouble - it's too "hostile"

I'd rather it load an empty profile while it wipes everything in the background.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›