This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Define "talent". Software developers focused on squeezing llms into everything regardless of necessity? I'm likely jaded as an infra monkey but you'll have to pay me x3 as much to fix your broken servers after the bubble pops.
"AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety".
Remove "AI" from that sentence and you'll see that's just more normal business practices that have been going on for decades.
The real question is: what profit? It's a sink hole in a hope to maximize reach
Ho, you can trust OpenAI and Nvidia to make a profit. You and your pension funds? What pension funds?
This is a ball and cup game designed to create cashflow where there is none. The 'profit' is the assets, dividends and capital gains the shareholder class will syphon out before the bubble bursts.
I sure hope they secretly sabotage on their way out to protect society
What profits?
Now what does that tell us about the sanity and safety?
This is many companies right now.
Mine is run from the top down (all executives) by people who use LLM's for fucking everything.
Everyone fucking hates them at this point. We all think they are fucking trash.
my older bro who WAS in tech uses it the same way, no thought of his own, he always use CHATGPT to find answers.
I used to find answers on Google, but Google Web search doesn't return good results anymore. So I end up using ai.
The MBA class has long been this way.
Maybe it's time to grab some fellow employees and make an employee owned business.
I would love for this to happen in so many industries but everything takes so much capital to get started :/
After $1T poured into global warming, why can't AI replace them ?
thats why they are trying to peddle data centers to india, for low cost maintenance.
And it's not even working. Not one of the AI companies is profitable. So they're putting the hope for profits some time in the future over sanity and safety.
"Fuck me Sam, I don't have anymore ideas on how to turn a profit. We've tried everything. How about we just give the AI its own infrastructure and bank account with the instructions 'make money' and see what it does? I know that safety guy advised against it before, but he no long works here. I mean if it becomes a singularity event, at least it's our singularity event to control"
Didn't they do this with an AI vending machine already and it started selling tungsten cubes at a massive loss?
In a way this is what’s most scary. Because they are desperate. Any safety concerns will be damned and they are all racing to be the first who makes a breakthrough in the direction of AGI.
If we ever get there, this is not the way it should be done. I hope they remember that we need to have a world where they can spend their money.
That's a talk ask for desperate people to consider.
Steve Burke (of GN) described the absurdity pretty well, within the context of the currently uncertain Nvidia and OpenAI deal:
Nvidia offered OpenAI $100B in investment, money that it didn't have, as long as OpenAI gave that money back to Nvidia to lease GPUs that haven't been made, to then put in data centres that haven't been constructed, which will be powered by electricity that hasn't come online, to then rent to users who haven't subscribed, to provide them features that haven't come to fruition.
And hope you’ve propped up the economy enough by the end of it that the government has to ~~bail you out~~…sorry i meant provide a “backstop”.
I don't think they even care about profits anymore.
Billionaires live in the balance sheet, not the P/L statements.
AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety.
All businesses are. That's what a business is. A legal entity that seeks to extract as much wealth from people as possible. They put profits before people as a matter of policy.
Limited liability corporations should be outlawed.
If anybody leaves an AI company with a fat paycheck, promises to "be honest about the real problems," and then proceeds to regurgitate things the AI company CEOs say: be suspicious.
Exhibit A is Anthropic millionaire Mrinank Sharma, who only mentioned (future) peril from AI and AI-made bioweapons, two fictional scenarios on the short list that Anthropic officially endorses. It's a list of things that please Anthropic investors.
Real-world stuff like AI psychosis, poisoning people's air, or generating CSAM doesn't get a mention from him. There's no profit in acknowledging those things, so he won't.
Yep there is a deep attachment amongst AI boosters to certain doom and gloom scenarios that stem from their philosophical "think tanks" which use imaginary problems (e.g. "AGI 'misalignment' destroying the world through turning everything into paperclips") to lobby and alter our laws to benefit their real bosses -- anthropic, open ai, and friends.
Just vibe code the AI. I'm sure it'll work perfectly.
