this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
1059 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

78705 readers
4123 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A few years ago, Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos revealed how he thinks of local PC hardware as antiquated, ready to be replaced by cloud options from companies like AWS and Azure.

Bucha Bull to me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

TBH I don't think he's wrong, especially in HIS position.

Namely I think having the flexibility of the cloud is amazing... but NOT at the cost of losing sovereignty.

So when Bezos uses AWS he is actually smart because he remains sovereign. When anybody else though does rely on another system that they do not own for critical tasks then then lose sovereignty and thus agency.

TL;DR: cloud or not, maintain your agency.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

TL;DR: cloud or not, maintain your agency.

Even that is getting harder, thanks to google and micro$hit doing everything they can to lock down their respective OSs. Linux on a desktop, yadda yadda, but we're ~12 years into the smartphone era and we still don't fully own those electronic pieces of shit. Only a limited number of models can receive custom roms.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

FWIW I do have 2 Linux phones and... they work. The problem IMHO is that non-software companies believe THEY can lock or profit their customers via an "app". If they only provided a Web page instead rather than a mandatory mobile application then it wouldn't matter so much.

So, despite have working Linux phones (albeit far from perfect) I'm still relying on a deGoogled Android phone so that I can run mobile "apps" for only a couple of, quite important to me, services.

To summarize, I don't think it's the OS themselves that fuel lock-in but rather apps that require those locked down OSes.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 9 hours ago

The main driver for lock in is hardware. Like I said in my comment

Only a limited number of models can receive custom roms.