this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
327 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

59897 readers
526 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Any recommendations for my Homepage setup or services to add/replace?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OP built a security nightmare

How so?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Docker will happily download malicious containers. It doesn't use cryptography to verify what it downloads during the layer pull.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's overly dramatic phrasing and you know it. Adding this kind of hyper technical quip to a thread aimed at beginners is insane. Stop doing that.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 2 months ago

No. Just use apt. Don't fill your house with sensors that make you vulnerable

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Linux can do that too from miners, backdoors/SSH credential stealers, bots, rare ransomware but they exist, rootkits, spyware, and supply‑chain attacks

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

Apt has done sig checking since 2002 iirc