this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
738 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

84965 readers
3943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 88 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It would be great if there were some open source tool kits for this. If the technology is going to exist it should be in the hands of the people.

[–] Snoopey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Mora@pawb.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn, I thought I called it 8 months ago, but that was about reading heart rates using wifi...

[–] Snoopey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah it's nuts. There's also https://www.tommysense.com/ which is planning individual presence detection and location tracking within rooms using an esp32 mesh, but that's closed source

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 days ago

No cameras (total privacy)

Seems not for long...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, if this shit has to exist, at least let me use it for presence detection in Home Assistant without having to buy separate sensors or something!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 2 days ago

It would be amazing to not have to deploy a network of esp32s to do it with Bluetooth.

Although I'm already putting one in each room.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Probably just need a protocol to work with the data, however it can be interfaced with. Is it just measuring signal strength via speed over time?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If you're technical you might like enjoy this article that explains how the tracking works. Basically the router can perform math on the interference created by objects moving around the room. It seems like this would have to be part of the router firmware, which doesn't sound like a standard feature. But if it is, the fix would be to install modified firmware with that function disabled. The smoking gun will be if somebody gets into DMCA trouble for doing this.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

that's not a sufficient fix when you are living very close to other households

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A sufficient fix is not letting your wifi devices connect to your neighbor's network so their router can detect you walking between it and them.

[–] Niiru@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

New person in room detected, please drink verification can.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 6 points 2 days ago

Or an open source hardware device that changes your "wifi signature" randomly.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Opensource tech to do the same thing has been in the hands of the people for a long time. This is just a different way of doing it without motion sensors.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

these are not just motion sensors. these are much more accurate than that.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The motion sensing is more accurate in terms of fundamentally detecting movement, but if you're going from that to assuming it can identify who you are, no it doesn't do that. It can recognize a person as the same person it saw in the room yesterday, based on their gait and their effect on the local wifi signal, but it has no way of knowing if the pattern belongs to Old Man Wilson or Old Lady Jenkins, because there's no database tying those patterns to people's identities. And besides, the patterns are specific to that one signal environmnent anyway. It's not like a fingerprint or a facial image you could record at home and then match to someone walking around in a store, which has a different signal environment.