Asklemmy

54604 readers

395 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency? (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 hours ago by when@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gkpy@feddit.org 10 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Society condemns one and accepts the other

[–] when@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was looking for the logical consistency. They are accepting killing of animals (murder without consent) while condemning the rape (sex without consent) of animals.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 2 minutes ago

People aren't looking at the animal's rights.

They are condemning the humans who act in a disgusting way.

Most people would have the same reaction if you were cohabiting with a lawn mower.

Bonus...

https://youtu.be/B94lP-fZyLk

Gene Wilder makes love to a sheep. SFW

load more comments (1 replies)