this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
109 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

65927 readers
806 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Nothing AI is free. Unless there's a chain of custody for all of the training data, it's still unethical even if it's used for a good thing. If I build a wheelchair ramp out of the flesh and bones of orphans I'm still not a very good person. And there are non-AI ways to accomplish this that are just as good that would require almost comically less resources.

This attitude is why Ubuntu, and only Ubuntu, recommends a minimum of 6 GB of Ram btw. You can run a full KDE system with onboard graphics and all the bells and whistles for less than 2 GB on other distros.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If I build a wheelchair ramp out of the flesh and bones of orphans I’m still not a very good person.

Comparing copyright, a bullshit concept that was designed only to protect the rich, to building with "the flesh and bones of orphans" is so extreme that it's not even worth arguing about.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today -3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Being pro-AI is the same as being pro-capitalist, and thus pro-orphan crushing machine.

Having your work stolen so that a soulless faceless corporate entity can charge teenagers to recreate it at will and pretend they have any talent or capability whatsoever is pretty shitty, and defending it is anti-proletariat.

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You know you can use AI yourself too right? There's no need to be anti-AI when you can be anti-OpenAI/Anthropic/Google/etc.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 0 points 5 hours ago

Wow you mean I too can burn electricity while stealing artist's work so I can pretend to be an artist?! Wow mommy we can be homegrown douchebags these days!

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Nothing AI is free. Unless there’s a chain of custody for all of the training data, it’s still unethical even if it’s used for a good thing.

This is the weirdest sort of AI bullshit I keep coming across.

And there are non-AI ways to accomplish this that are just as good that would require almost comically less resources.

And... Where are they?

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is the weirdest sort of AI bullshit I keep coming across.

Hi this must be your first time on Earth in the last decade, every single AI company has been in or is currently in no less than ten dozen lawsuits over copyright infringement. It's so bad there's at least one website purpose built to track copyright infringement from AI companies..

Without a specific chain of custody for every piece of training data going into the models, there is a default that the model cannot be trusted and is likely infringing on someone's copyright.

To specify the 'nothing AI is free" part, LLMs are grossly computationally inefficient. Whether it's local or not.

And… Where are they?

Already installed on most distros.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So where are the winning lawsuits of all that copyright infringement then?

Already installed on most distros.

And they are called... ?

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence

Bartz v. Anthropic

Kadrey v. Meta

UMG v Udio

Those are the settled ones so far. This is 4 years into AI existing. Lawsuits, especially copyright lawsuits, tend to take up to a decade in the US, because the US legal system is shit.

Here's 118 currently in progress. Because AI is copyright infringement.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence

In February 2025, the court granted summary judgment that such copying was not fair use, emphasizing that the purpose of ROSS’s copying was to build a directly competing product

Bartz v. Anthropic

The court granted summary judgment for Anthropic that training LLMs on copyrighted materials is fair use.

Kadrey v. Meta

Judge Vince Chhabria denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on fair use and granted Meta’s cross-motion and granted Meta’s motion for partial summary judgment on the DMCA claim.

UMG v Udio

Settled - no judgement.

Those are the settled ones so far. This is 4 years into AI existing. Lawsuits, especially copyright lawsuits, tend to take up to a decade in the US, because the US legal system is shit.

Here’s 118 currently in progress. Because AI is copyright infringement.

Having lawsuits is not winning lawsuits. The AI companies have been winning on fair use. Same as Google back in the 2000s when they were sued for for various search products (news, books, etc.).