this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
83 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24447 readers
250 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 45 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

So, book burning.

They're going to erase huge chunks of our legacy, aren't they?

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"Responsible physical sourcing is not book burning," ISBNdb’s site in a section about why it’s crucial to recycle the destroyed books. “It is the completion of a book’s lifecycle: from tree to knowledge to tree again."

"My statements on book burning answer questions about the statements on book burning."

I mean, I get why books are being destroyed (the spines are cut open as part of the scanning process and it's too expensive to put them back together at scale/copyright issues), but it's as the headline says. Not exactly something that generates sympathy. Another problem is they're all doing it and not sharing the results. Even if they make some godly AI supercomputer, thousands of other companies were doing the same thing on failed projects, destroying millions of books for nothing.

[–] Budwig_v_1337hoven@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

they could just scan without destroying the books. It would be slower, but you could still use the book after

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

They’re using similar LLM technology along with X-rays to scan burned scrolls and shit, meanwhile it’s destroying these books.

Make it make sense.

load more comments (5 replies)