this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
373 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86930 readers
3171 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Not could. It's a mathematical certainty that it will. Barring a breakthrough miracle -- fat chance.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It really feels like the options are:

  • Bubble bursts because it requires more money than the entire global economy not too at this point.
  • Total regulatory capture and we just somehow keep it going forever to the detriment and gradual decay of literally everything else.
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

One day we shall reclaim the sullied em dash for ourselves once and for all!

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

An AI breakthrough has nothing to do with LLMs, it's like saying the auto industry will collapse except if there is an AI breakthrough that saves it.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's what a breakthrough means. But obviously all the funding is burned up in more DCs with incremental iteration on the same design. So the bubble has to pop for real innovation. But I think this coming AI winter will be permanent, as things are very visibly falling apart.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well yeah, but my statement is true anyways IMO. Deep neural networks are unchanged since the eighties I guess, and again IMO it's not they who need/can have a breakthrough, doubly especially since nobody seems to be working on anything else than "bigger datasets" and profiling and such.