this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
98 points (98.0% liked)

Programming

28251 readers
290 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

I cannot for the life of me understand AI mandates.

Who doesn’t want to be able to get their work done easier? Nobody.

Then it follows you shouldn’t have to tell your employees to use a tool if it makes them however much as productive as CEOs think that tech demo should make them.

I think it’s pretty obvious that at the exec level AI is the ultimate hoodwinking machine. It’s made 90% of them look like the out of touch morons they are. The 10% or whatever that aren’t trying to force this down their staff’s throats in the hopes they can replace said staff are coming out smelling like roses.

Don’t fit a square peg in a round hole.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If AI actually made people faster and more productive, they could simply set faster timelines and people would use the tools.

There are AI mandates because the people in leadership are stupid and dishonest. "Return to office" has the same shape. For many people working from home is healthier and more productive, and it's better for the environment not to commute as much, but the emotional needs of leadership are primary.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

If AI actually made people faster and more productive, they could simply set faster timelines and people would use the tools.

I want to work with your team. I work with a sysadmin who, rather than using the up-arrow, will scroll up in his terminal to copy / paste the last command he ran. Even if that command was just "ls -l".

It's maddening to watch and horribly inefficient. But he's always done it that way.

Many people simply do not seek a faster way of doing things.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Teach him ctrl+r, life changing when you plug out into fzf

[we've] always done it that way

This is one of my biggest pet peeves.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago

Many people simply do not seek a faster way of doing things.

Right. But if you're a soulless manager, and you set faster timelines, you PIP and fire the people who don't make it. They'll use the tools or be replaced.

It's the same as an AI mandate, except less stupid. (It can still be stupid if you set the timelines impossibly fast, but management is not known for being smart or informed)

I wouldn't do this as me because I'm not a soulless manager.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I do not want to work with such people, and rite incompetence is something any organization should try to combat.

But forcing period to use AI tools will only mask this problem.

load more comments (13 replies)