Other things I use are a chip card for local train tickets (it never runs out of battery) and a PC with a solid real two-factor authentication based on chipcard and an optical TAN generator for banking.
And when I am exploring new areas on the bike, I sometimes just use the old paper maps - they don't run out of battery either, and they give s much better overview than a tiny phone screen.
Interesting that for many people one obstacle to a desired reduction in phone usage is that it has become in practical terms more difficult to not use a phone.
It is tech with a lot of addictive design, and people are increasingly becoming aware of it.
But there are quite a few things one can do. For example, I am using again a traditional wristwatch, instead of looking at the phone. The reason is that I do not like to constantly look at my phone when I just need to know the time.
Yes. The Brexiters argued that they would be better off without an agreement with the Europesn Union on future trade policy and sgreements, seeing a "No-Deal-Brexit" as leverage which left the UK free to make more advantageous trade agreements with other countries.
Years later, not a single agreement has materialized which could even remotely make up for the lost trade with the European Union.
And, ironically, business sectors which thougth that they would profit from Brexit like fishing companies or farmers, suffered the most because they were completely unaware how much advantage the collaboration within the EU was giving them.
SURPRISE, that is EXACTLY the same thing that the Brexiters wanted! How come?
(And look at how it's going...)
The article is lacking some hard numbers.
It cites Bitcom on constant high screen time But Bitcom is an industrial lobby group. They are for example anti-privacy and anti-data protection. I wouldn't expect them to publish anything which is not in the interest of Big Tech.