this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
119 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

87002 readers
2753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
119
Boeing 737 Max operators told to check fuselages for cracks (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 days ago by dwazou@jlai.lu to c/technology@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's Boeing, I ain't going.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How far they've fallen, all due to a single acquisition.

For those unaware, the saying used to be "If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going". The reason for this was because Boeing had a well deserved reputation for quality, reliability, and overengineering. It was a company run by engineers. Another company named McDonnell Douglas, with the polar opposite reputation, went or was about to go bankrupt. It was a company run by salesmen. Boeing decided to buy McDonnell Douglas but instead of firing the entirety of MD's executive branch, they decided to absorb them. In short order the MD virus that was their sales first executive team spread and eventually took over Boeing.

This is as I remember it so if I got something wrong, please correct me.

[–] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago

It's mostly correct, but even before McDonnell Douglas in the early 90's Boeing actually had repeat issues of 737 rudders reversing direction in flight, causing accidents. Their response was exactly the same as the MAX8 crashes, cover it up and blame the pilots. It even sounds to me like they tampered with evidence according to Admiral Cloudberg's telling of it: https://imgur.com/a/5wcFx8M

Boeing, which had packed the valve for shipping, did not explain why it kept the spring and the end cap. It instead tried to steer the NTSB toward a conclusion that the crash was caused by a wind rotor

I certainly still agree things got MUCH worse after the merger though

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A business example of rotten apples spoiling the whole batch.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

It's actually worse than that. Boeing bought MD with stocks, which means MD essentially bought Boeing with Boeing's money.