this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
632 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

16380 readers
1152 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Why aren't private companies pushing trains? They could make so much money. No?

adolf muskrat made a killing pretending to push trains.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 14 hours ago

Way more profit in selling everyone a depreciating asset you make them completely dependent on so they can never go back

[–] unglueclass23@programming.dev 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They make more money selling cars. Think of how many cars are needed now that everyone needs their own personal one vs trains where 1 can transport hundreds of people.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

A company in Texas tried, but the state government deliberately killed it.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Because it is a complex business model. Well actually two. Freight railroads work by transporting a load of freight from one location to another one far away. Massive long trains can easily transport as much as a 100 trucks. So scale makes it worth it, but for a lot of cargo it is truck -> train -> truck, which means you need a certain distance to make it significantly shorter not to go by truck directly. So a freight railroad needs to build a long railroad to make it worth it and that is a huge initial investment.

For passengers you can see the model in Japan. Basically it is a real estate company improving its land value by offering a better rail connection.

Both require a lot of money.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

And even in Japan, isn't it a bunch of conglomerate companies fighting each other and most of them not actually making and profit from passenger rail?

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 5 points 13 hours ago

Not really, no.

Although there is one example in the U.S: Brightline