Patient Gamers

20023 readers

10 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

Relavent communities: !games@lemmy.world !games@sh.itjust.works !retrogaming@lemmy.world !videogamesuggestions@lemmy.zip !linux_gaming@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

cod@lemmy.world

briongloid@aussie.zone

BurntWits@sh.itjust.works

Weekly Recommendations Thread: What are you playing this week? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by BurntWits@sh.itjust.works to c/patientgamers@sh.itjust.works

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lustyargonian@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Playing Witcher 3 lately for the first time. Coming from already playing games like Kingdom Come Deliverance, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, and modern God of War games, it’s interesting to see how Witcher 3 retains its original flavour and yet its formula has been taken into various extremes by other games. I love the realism and interesting story lines of KCD, and the mindless addictive loop of AC Odyssey full of fantastical myths and moral choices, and the emotional depth of God of War. Overall I weirdly feel KCD took the best lessons and created something really unique.

I don’t know if it’s fair to compare these games like this, but yeah, I get these comparisons in my mind.

Speaking of Witcher 3, it took me three tries to actually get into it, the game is quite a lot when you start it, especially not having played first two. But once I did, it was really fun. I was torn at every moral choice, and a bit burnt out eventually. I don’t love difficult choices with consequences in games as in real life, but it’s good to confront that anyway. A lot of the quests are memorable for that reason.

Overall, enjoying it a lot. I’m sure people in 2015 must have their minds blown by this game back then.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah I've not played it yet either. It's on my list, after I eventually finish baldur's gate 3.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is the Witcher series similar to Fallout in that the first 2 are very different and you might as well start with the 3rd when they've worked out the kinks or at least bridged closer to modernity?

[–] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

It's not as dramatic of a departure as Fallout but the change in style and scope is obvious.

Witcher 1 was built on a modified Neverwinter Nights engine, so it feels and looks somewhat "classic". It has rhythm based combat with clear focus on preparations and knowing how to approach each enemy (though not to a hardcore degree). UI is clearly PC focused and should look very intuitive if you're familiar with old RPGs. It's also map based, with loading screens between locations and access to certain maps dependant on which chapter of the game you're at.
Witcher 2 is more action orientated but still keeps some of the importance of prep. It's presentation is slicker and graphically looks much better but some of the design decisions (especially UI ones) shifted somewhat in a more gamepad friendly direction. It has similar structure to W1 except instead of bunch of smaller maps you have big open areas you move between with each chapter.
Witcher 3 is a modern action RPG with open world, gamepad friendly design etc. Combat is much closer to what you'd expect based on other similar titles (though with more weighty movement), prep is mostly optional (unless you spec into it and/or play on higher difficulty) and it's generally the most accessible title for those who don't vibe with more classic RPG gameplay.

While things like combat evolved towards more mainstream appeal, others (like conversations, writing in general) improved without changing the core feel/design of the experience - only modernised them and put some additional polish made possible by increased budget.
There are also some things (the main being choices with long term consequences) which didn't relay as much on technology and stayed pretty much the same throughout the whole series.

Last but not least, Unlike the Fallout titles, Witcher games are a continuous story. While you can start with 3, there will be some moments that won't work as well as they would if you played the previous titles. Still, plenty of people started with 3 and enjoyed it quite a bit so missing this additional context won't destroy your experience - it's more of a bonus.

TL;DR: Yes but to a lesser extent.