this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
443 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87184 readers
4042 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what they are monitoring for, to try to match people up who might do vandalism on the cameras.

You gotta say “DEFINITELY NOBODY TIE BLACK GARBAGE BAGS OVER FLOCK CAMERA.”

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, but if we make them monitor everybody, then we can increase the signal to noise ratio so much that they can't catch anybody.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

I agree with @ji_reilly@lemmy.ml.

If it was a human that was reviewing all that footage, maybe but if it’s all automated by AI, especially as AI gets better, there is no noise. Only a camera logging everything you do in a searchable database.

[–] ji_reilly@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

I fear this is no longer true. Technology has trivialized the cost to surveil a country's population. The U.S. will endlessly fund doing so.