this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
579 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

88098 readers
3575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How would you get around that? That amount of money is most certainly take-you-to-court worthy.

[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They will take you to court. When you lose, they will order you to pay. When you do not pay, they will garnish your wages. You would end up paying, the original debt, plus all of the legal fees and fines.

This is not something that gets sent to a debt collector who will call you a bunch of times before selling your debt to someone else.

[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Then court it is. The debt isn't in the father's name. The company would have to sue for it.

My credit card can only go to like $5000. Anything extra is the company's negligence.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The company will pay it, then it will sue the father for the non-work related charges. Maybe Google will cave and dismiss most or all of the charges. But if they do not, the company most certainly will not eat it and be satisfied. Losing his job would be the least of his worries. They will eventually petition to have the court collect the money via force (garnishment). Trust me, either way, you’d end up paying at least some amount.

[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't know if it's for sure thing that the company would pay, honestly, either.

It could possibly just get stuck in accounts payable.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL

What does "get stuck in accounts payable" mean?

If you have a debt of $100k, and you don't pay, eventually the court takes all your money and all your stuff.

[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 1 points 1 day ago

A lot of companies just end up not paying. See Trump's companies for an example.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Do you know how credit cards work by chance

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Contract law isn't usually loser pays.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t understand what you are trying to say.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're trying to say that losing a contract dispute doesn't make you liable for 'all' of the legal fees, just your own.

In some situations the plaintiff can also have the defendant be required to pay their legal fees, this just isn't one of them.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well...perhaps YouTube's TOS means you agree to pay such fees, if the father signed the kid up and agreed to them. And a court always has discretion, even if the default is to pay your own fees.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's fair, you're right that there's more nuance to it and it may be as you say. I just wanted to provide a layman's explanation for future readers.