this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2026
115 points (83.2% liked)

Memes

57597 readers
1753 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Squidiey@lemmy.ml -5 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

???

PETA is sus as freak. (They euthanize completely fine or treatable animals, and they even took a little gal's dog)

I don't have a problem with animal rights stuff and veganism, I have a problem with PETA.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Completely fine and treatable animals.

They do sometimes euthanize healthy animals, just like your local Humane Society does. The thing is, there are no-kill shelters in Norfolk, VA. When they turn away animals because they're at capacity, those animals either end up at kill shelters, or on the street where they're likely to kill other animals and die a worse death.

The employees who took Maya the Chihuahua were tasked with collecting stray dogs from that neighborhood who were harassing local livestock. One of those dogs was an unattended brown female chihuahua with no tags, and they accidentally picked up the wrong unattended brown female chihuahua with no tags. You know what happened to the employees who did that? They were fired, because they didn't follow PETA's own guidelines about keeping animals for a certain amount of time before euthanizing them.

Sidenote, maybe you should question why that family let this chihuahua out on the street in a neighborhood where there were stray dogs attacking livestock, and also why PETA didn't kidnap their other dogs, who were safely contained in their yard at the time.

Some further reading. Please don't disregard it just because it comes from PETA's website. If you disagree with anything they say, you should be able to verbalize that disagreement

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

Pardon me while I go on a tangent. I worked at a no-kill shelter for 10 years, so I think I'm pretty fucking qualified to say that kill shelters like PETA's are necessary. There were cats and dogs at our shelter that we got as puppies and kittens who lived there until their teens. It feels nice to know that we're not going to euthanize an animal just because it hasn't been adopted, until you think about the fact that we have a limited amount of space for animals.

A dog takes up a whole dog run. A cat takes up a whole cat kennel. There is limited space for animals at shelters, and they're always at capacity. How many perfectly healthy and adoptable animals did we turn away to be dumped on the street or sent to a kill shelter so that we could keep a chronically ill or otherwise unadoptable animal alive for years and years and years? You save one life, and condemn dozens of others to death. A no-kill shelter is just a deferred kill shelter.

[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

...sus as freak...

Jesus fucking christ...

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 18 points 11 hours ago

That’s not what they are saying. They are saying PETA is just a bunch of morons, not calculating meat people.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm like 90% sure if you look up whatever make you think PETA is going around stealing and euthanizing pets, you'll find an industry plant.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Named Nathan Winograd. Dude would condemn any number of wild animals to a grizzly and painful death to maintain his superiority complex about euthanizing companion animals. It's obviously so much better to let disease spread, create more feral companion animals, and condemn more tens of thousands of prey animals to death than it is to euthanize one (1) cat.