this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
772 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

59999 readers
421 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ooh, I didn't know that someone had developed a mechanism to move issues and PRs.

I remember commenting on the fact that while it's easy to move the source repo itself from location to location, as git makes that easy and self-contained, issues and PRs didn't enjoy that.

[–] marsokod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can easily do that with forgejo/gitea. However, you cannot sync these issues, that's a one-off operation.

You can however totally sync the git repo - either out of the box or using web hooks/git hooks.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YMMV. I've seen issues in migration from Gitea to Codeberg. Always test first.

[–] marsokod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ouch, and that is with Gitea and Codeberg being essentially the same software.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I bet you could sync issues if you were bored enough. It'd be a pipeline that you have to maintain and two way syncs are a pain to maintain, but I bet it's doable