this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
448 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

89099 readers
3924 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

AI only feels like it boosts productivity because it kicks the can down the road and makes it somebody else's job to clean it up.

You saved time generating your work email? Now I spend time translating what it's actually supposed to say because half of it is irrelevant garbage.

You saved time generating your event poster? Now I spend time recreating it (because you've anchored on that version), or painstakingly editing out all the incorrect notation.

You saved time generating your logo? No there's no way to 'clean it up', the anatomy and structure makes no physical sense. So I have to recreate it from scratch anyway.

You saved time automating this spreadsheet? It's not arranged in an importable format and now i have to spend time breaking down all the arbitrarily merged cells so I can even use it. My computer freezes twice under the load of processing excess garbage data.

You only think AI saves time because it's wasting somebody else's.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 9 points 13 hours ago

It's a big multiplier on incompetence. It lets someone who's kind of bad at their job produce a lot more bad than they could before.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 3 points 13 hours ago

The spreadsheet one hurts. I'm currently going over a colleague's fancy spreadsheet and have decided that only an AI can edit it in the future, because the formulas are written in a way that need to be interacted with from a script or command-line tool and nobody's going to do that.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Inside the tech industry, the company with the biggest payoff in this is NVIDIA. With another smaller payoff for AMD. That's about it.

It's like a gold rush for fool's gold. The only ones making money are the guys selling shovels.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 28 minutes ago

Don't forget all the short term gains the rest of us are getting with tech debt!

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yea no shit. How could anyone have foreseen this!?

[–] Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

No shit it has trouble coding a simple html site how is AI replacing anyone.

[–] grooveygroovester@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Big tech isn't exactly winning either. Over $194 billion spent with mere millions in ROI thus far.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

record numbers of “how do i connect to localhost from my friend’s laptop” and useless dashboards your devs were too busy to make, tho

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The AI revolution has achieved something truly unprecedented: billions in spending, endless executive keynotes, and no measurable payoff for most businesses. Apparently the killer app was convincing CEOs to transfer their budgets to seven tech companies: »Revenue per worker is rising for the Mag 7 but is flat for the S&P 493.«

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I see this as a potentially GOOD thing. All those companies who dove in headfirst are gonna come out of it significantly weakened, while those wise enough to take a more measured approach will get the opportunity to take the leadership positions they probably deserve (at least more than those others). If nothing else, there might be more competition after all this.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 26 minutes ago

If they didn't lose any money to the black swan AI crash, then they don't need a bailout.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

ai has also made some people way more productive and automated some really valuable things

the entire industry hasn't quite been one-guyed as yet. the numbers definitely don't match the epic valuations however

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Outside Nvidia. The shovel users are not making money.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In other news,

SHOCKING! Economically critical demographic of CEOs FAIL reverse turing test! You'll never guess who...

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 20 points 1 day ago

They were so happy to throw hardworking people onto the street in favour of AI because they were hoping for quick easy money and unless they start to grovel in front of pedo in the WH to save them with a bailout most of them will be declaring bankruptcy soon, but that might have been the plan all along so they can be bought cheap.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s also a joke how poorly most companies are adopting AI. For many companies there have been meaningful improvements in software over the last few years that have been ignored completely and suddenly these same companies want to step over a bunch of stairs at once (insert meme) and do AI-buzzword-everything.

It doesn’t work like that

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

The metal fab company i work for is still using software from the 80's. The same with our state unemployment office lol.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Professional grifter finds new grift not sufficiently contributing to grift counter.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd argue that most tech companies aren't actually seeing benefit matching what they've wasted ineffectively

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t even know if the company I work for has actually gotten more benefit than it’s cost us. The bill is significant, for one thing. For another we have a whole group of people developing AI tools for internal use now. They aren’t cheap. Of course there’s some benefit but is it net positive? No idea. Is it hugely positive? Fuck no.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Definitely not the panacea it's being peddled as. I have yet to see the expectation pan out that I can work less and do the things I enjoy more. (Keep in mind I loved what I did for work so it didn't used to seem like work. Now it does)

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let’s not forget the endgame of decimating home computing.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No more computers for peasants.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 21 hours ago

We can do too much with them.

[–] banana_pie@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago

AI feels at home in Bash. Corporate office work is mouse shoveling and email back and forth. Its a long way to get there.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

It's a good thing those invasive advertisers are currently covering everybody's losses. Fuck invasive ads, especially Tide!

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's even funnier when consumers adopt AI agents to get refunds, move money around to high yield accounts, find deals and coupons and companies panic when it works.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

It's already happening and wastes a tremendous amount of time. In a sea of bullshit slop there might be one (1) claim that's actually valid and might land you in deep legal trouble if not addressed. As usual small business are the most vulnerable to this.

[–] echo@lemmy.today -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Productivity isn't where most businesses are going to strike pay dirt. They're going to get their value in processing information and in prototyping ideas/products/solutions before actually physically making them.

So the article may be absolutely true and completely missing the point.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

*having an illusion of information processing and producing tons of shitty prototypes. Yeah, sure, get their value, right

that's more about how most businesses use llms, less about what they are actually good/bad at