this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
342 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

89077 readers
3782 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

record numbers of “how do i connect to localhost from my friend’s laptop” and useless dashboards your devs were too busy to make, tho

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

In other news,

SHOCKING! Economically critical demographic of CEOs FAIL reverse turing test! You'll never guess who...

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 72 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The AI revolution has achieved something truly unprecedented: billions in spending, endless executive keynotes, and no measurable payoff for most businesses. Apparently the killer app was convincing CEOs to transfer their budgets to seven tech companies: »Revenue per worker is rising for the Mag 7 but is flat for the S&P 493.«

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 32 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I see this as a potentially GOOD thing. All those companies who dove in headfirst are gonna come out of it significantly weakened, while those wise enough to take a more measured approach will get the opportunity to take the leadership positions they probably deserve (at least more than those others). If nothing else, there might be more competition after all this.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

ai has also made some people way more productive and automated some really valuable things

the entire industry hasn't quite been one-guyed as yet. the numbers definitely don't match the epic valuations however

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago
[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 14 hours ago
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 31 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Outside Nvidia. The shovel users are not making money.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 17 points 13 hours ago

They were so happy to throw hardworking people onto the street in favour of AI because they were hoping for quick easy money and unless they start to grovel in front of pedo in the WH to save them with a bailout most of them will be declaring bankruptcy soon, but that might have been the plan all along so they can be bought cheap.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

It's a good thing those invasive advertisers are currently covering everybody's losses. Fuck invasive ads, especially Tide!

[–] banana_pie@piefed.zip 5 points 11 hours ago

AI feels at home in Bash. Corporate office work is mouse shoveling and email back and forth. Its a long way to get there.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 15 points 14 hours ago

It’s also a joke how poorly most companies are adopting AI. For many companies there have been meaningful improvements in software over the last few years that have been ignored completely and suddenly these same companies want to step over a bunch of stairs at once (insert meme) and do AI-buzzword-everything.

It doesn’t work like that

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago

Professional grifter finds new grift not sufficiently contributing to grift counter.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

I'd argue that most tech companies aren't actually seeing benefit matching what they've wasted ineffectively

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Let’s not forget the endgame of decimating home computing.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No more computers for peasants.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 3 hours ago

We can do too much with them.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's even funnier when consumers adopt AI agents to get refunds, move money around to high yield accounts, find deals and coupons and companies panic when it works.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

It's already happening and wastes a tremendous amount of time. In a sea of bullshit slop there might be one (1) claim that's actually valid and might land you in deep legal trouble if not addressed. As usual small business are the most vulnerable to this.

[–] echo@lemmy.today 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Productivity isn't where most businesses are going to strike pay dirt. They're going to get their value in processing information and in prototyping ideas/products/solutions before actually physically making them.

So the article may be absolutely true and completely missing the point.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

*having an illusion of information processing and producing tons of shitty prototypes. Yeah, sure, get their value, right

that's more about how most businesses use llms, less about what they are actually good/bad at