this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
1185 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

79236 readers
2200 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 30 points 3 days ago

Here's an archive link in case anyone else refuses to give Substack views due to their affinity for Nazis: https://archive.is/ns4Yq

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’ve got a Ubiquiti setup with cameras and a doorbell. It isn’t cheap but it’s local and I highly recommend them if you have the budget.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itistime@infosec.pub 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where are the hactivists?! Are they all too well employed?

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see in the world

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I remember last year when there was a trend of AI generated videos that depicted animals or people doing ridiculous and crazy things on doorbell cameras. Everyone was surprised at how realistic they looked but never questioned why there was enough training data of doorbell cameras to make them in the first place.

Not that relevant, but it makes it pretty clear how "private" this data was in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Time to put a goatse picture in front of the camera!

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thank God I still haven't looked that up.

[–] AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

Every once in a while, I come across someone who makes me jealous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Dammit, I fell for rings assurances of “only in response to a warrant”. Mostly out of laziness, but still ….. I really am going to have to figure out self hosting a video doorbell, aren’t i

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Of course that happened, that happens every time when you buy things but then don't own them.

I'll buy cams for my home, but they'll be for ME alone because they're MY cameras, MY video.

Obligatory fuck Amazon and fuck the USA

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (7 children)

As far as I can tell it's still voluntary. This is their policy. It sounds like if you choose to share photos or video with public safety organizations, that now Flock and hence ICE can access it.

That all said, fuck Flock and I certainly don't want anything I share (which I never have) to contribute to the profits of a private surveillance company. The solution here appears to be share nothing with public safety at all ever so that contract is worth nothing.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nice of them to completely undermine what "public safety" means for the 326,774,980th time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This may finally convince my parents to get rid of their ring camera. Thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

It's just out in the open, you're too stupid if you think they didn't do it already.

[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You know they are in all of your cloud connected cameras, inside your home, inside your tesla, pretty much everywhere you have a camera... Definitely not just at your front door. The key thing to understand about the surveillance state is that they only acknowledge access of personal data if they intend to use it in a court room. Most of it is just used for spying, information gathering, and parallel construction if necessary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Crazy how a company owned by Amazon would do this. /s

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 12 points 3 days ago

Are people going to start listening to their "paranoid" nephews yet?

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah, the idea of Amazon running my home security did NOT appeal to me. I went with another brand.

[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I think I want to print out a letter and put it in everyone's home in my neighborhood with one of these. To at least let them know who they're helping. I'd bet a vast majority have no idea.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reason #186729 why it's insane to have no right to privacy in public.

Fun fact: Recording the public is illegal in Germany. Any private video camera must only be able to record your own property. If you do record (and store - smart doorbells without storage that are only active when they are rung are exempted) material you must have visible warnings (that others can see BEFORE being recorded) or else any evidence you collect is likely to be thrown out in court.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›