$500 million accidental bill, meanwhile people get fired for a few minutes of """time theft"""
technology
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company
CEO complains about class struggle
I don't get it. Why wouldn't the employees like doing valuable things? Have you diverged your own interests from theirs?
Me years ago when I spent 2 weeks writing a one off script to accomplish something that would take me 4 hours to do manually because I had nothing better to do at work
This literally made me laugh out loud.
Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.
"Well, we're firing you all."
"To replace us with AI??"
"No it's because we spent too much on AI and now we can't afford you or AI"
they could use their money more efficiently and increase productivity by giving it straight to nvidia for GPUs so the employees can game on company time
Throwing AI licenses at the wall and seeing what sticks (or what Velastegui calls the "thousand flowers bloom" approach) isn't leading to tangible returns, she said.
Make sure to not use chinese ai though because that would be unamerican.
Watch western AI companies just buy chinese AI and then rebrand it as american.
they don't even have to buy it, deepseek is free (gratis). i think it only has use based restrictions for military stuff.
deepseek does horny stuff??
3.4 You will not use the Services to generate, express or promote content or a chatbot that:
(5) is pornographic, obscene, or sexually explicit (e.g., sexual chatbots);
Volcelseek
first take a cold shower. second i don't know but it is not against the license if it does not violate any other laws. the license of deepseek-V3 (based on this) states:
attachment A
You agree not to use the Model or Derivatives of the Model:
- In any way that violates any applicable national or international law or regulation or infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of any third party;
- For military use in any way;
- For the purpose of exploiting, harming or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way;
- To generate or disseminate verifiably false information and/or content with the purpose of harming others;
- To generate or disseminate inappropriate content subject to applicable regulatory requirements;
- To generate or disseminate personal identifiable information without due authorization or for unreasonable use;
- To defame, disparage or otherwise harass others;
- For fully automated decision making that adversely impacts an individual’s legal rights or otherwise creates or modifies a binding, enforceable obligation;
- For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against or harming individuals or groups based on online or offline social behavior or known or predicted personal or personality characteristics;
- To exploit any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons based on their age, social, physical or mental characteristics, in order to materially distort the behavior of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
- For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against individuals or groups based on legally protected characteristics or categories.
Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather.
fuck yeah

is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet?
The thermostat is on the other side of the room, ergo I must burn AI tokens to use electricity to increase the global temperature.
it's too warm, when will it cool down, when will it cool down?
Please, the tokenmaxxing meta can do better than this. Put a temperature sensor outside a data center running the AI then have the AI check temperature changes in real time and write essays on why it might be changing. As it works the data center rises temps and it has to write more as temps change. Self reinforcing token burning.
You need to have another ai agent editing the essays and then another agent writing detailed critiques of each essay
Maybe I should be using AI at work🤔
Don’t you want to know the last digit of pi?
I'm going through a tokenmaxxing phase rn. Profitcels about to get slopmogged, while I'm based and clankerpilled.
chatPPB find a way to say "hell yeah GOOD post" in no fewer that 69420 words

hell yeah GOOD post
Probably would have been more environmentally friendly to just set up 500M in dollar bills on fire
In car tires even.


You forgot the most relevant one!

I’ve read that Anthropic’s yearly revenue is in the single/double digit billions (want to say 13.5, but I’m not sure) so this company’s error would account for 4% (if my 13.5b is the number) of their yearly revenue in one month…
Tax the shit out of these morons. They and their companies are too stupid to be responsible for that much money. Take it away from them, and give it to the people. Start by forcing companies to kick back 50% of their gross profits to their employees.
They are basically setting money on fire. Taxing it won't do much. What's needed is the Chinese model where businesses can't fire workers to replace them with AI. That law is just as much for the protection of businesses as it is for the protection of workers.
yeah if i had unlimited token access i would just make it write my emails and documentation which it is semi good at rather than writing bad code that takes the same amount of time to double check as writing it myself. that might count as a productivity boost but it's probably not what they are after. "no we don't want to make your job easier we want to make your job redundant".
I actually think the single most useful AI task is translating into corporate speak. You can say "Write an email telling Janet to go fuck herself but politely."
And it'll be like "Good Afternoon Janet, I hope you are doing well today..." bla bla.
Janet: Summarize this email to the core of what LittleFella is trying to tell me.
AI: go fuck yourself
EFFICIENCY!
this reminds me of when AWS was the hot new thing and people did not understand you have to define a spending limit. how did people fuck this up AGAIN?
they only care about optimizing costs when it comes to paying workers
Because its not about the costs. It's about making sure workers stay desperate and destitute. So they can't organize.
Data: When enterprises are hesitant to give AI agents unfettered access to proprietary data, those agents become less effective, Josh Pantony, CEO of Boosted.ai, which focuses on AI tools for finance, told Axios.

Many businesses are so unbelievably gullible when it comes to AI. They throw all existing performance indicators out of the window and only chase AI adoption about all else. Doesn't matter if it makes the employee more productive. Those burning many tokens are commended, those not using enough AI are fired.
wow turns out if you're over leveraged on strategic costs, the vendor will notice
I don't think it's possible to spend that much on tokens doing mundane work, which means they probably had a bunch of fucking openclaw and agentic bullshit going on churning tokens on the most expensive models 24/7.
I really don't know how google can afford what seems to be running chatgpt on every single search being done
Im gonna be real ive been searching all kinds of nonsense with the small but of joy knowing it's very expensive for them and i'm making them absolutely no money
Google I get, they run the models on their own hardware. DDG makes no sense to me tho
That still costs money though so it's like why does google let me turn their search bot into a horny roleplay with a few simple "pretend you're doing this" commands while other companies charge a shitload for stuff like that and still lose money? to be clear i'm only doing the horny roleplay to lose google money, don't get the wrong idea, pervert
The code formatting is difficult to read on mobile when the lines run long.
Not ideal on desktop either
Hoping that thid was the hexbear here that was asking how best to sabotage their companies adoption of ai.
Is that article slop? The structure is inhuman and the text is abbridged but lacks the clarity of a summary.
