this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
727 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4406 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This first bill allows the state of California to regulate and oversee all 3D prints in the name of public safety.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 26 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This is America, wouldn’t it be easier just to buy a gun? I get that 3D printers can make ghost guns that aren’t traceable but how many crimes have occurred where that is the murder weapon?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

One CEO. More important than every dead schoolchild.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

They asked about crimes.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Agreed. Every time I've looked into printing one I look at the process and just buy it. All the ghost guns I've made were from hollowed-out 80% lowers. And one time a hardware store slamfire shotgun.

I fully support one's right to print a gat, but it sure ain't for me.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Thats the neat part: they can make weapons the same way I can theoretically make a bomb from enriched uranium in my backyard.

Not as much as you think. The thing is even in countries with strict gun laws 3D printed firearms are a negligible part of firearm crime.

This isn't to say that they don't exist. I saw images of criminal gun factories in Australia (which have been around well before 3D printing) that had integrated 3D printing into their stuff, but they still do a lot of metal work, too.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What does this accomplish?

In the USA it's easier to buy an ar-15 than configuring a multi material 3d printer to print a fidget spinner

And btw if someone really needs to 3d print a weapon they would CNC a receiver from a metal block using a $500 AliExpress contraption rather than making a single use plastic thingy that will probably amputate your fingers at first shot

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

What does this accomplish?

Spies on people who are printing large quantities of whistles.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

We need an international industry of dis-enshittifiers

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 179 points 1 week ago (1 children)

in the name of public safety

In the name of gutting small manufacturing and the ability to repair your own devices. This has never had anything to do with safety, as they can't even do the thing the bill demands. Fucking asinine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 106 points 1 week ago (17 children)

"Uhoh, can't 3d print a gun. Guess I'll just go to Walmart."

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 95 points 1 week ago (51 children)

Under the proposal, printers would have to evaluate STL files, CAD files, or other geometric code using a firearm blueprint detection algorithm and block files flagged as capable of producing a firearm or illegal firearm parts, including conversion devices.

California's Department of Justice, or another relevant state agency, would have until January 1, 2028, to publish performance standards for detection algorithms and software control processes.

This is the problem when lawmakers write technical bills without speaking to technical people. They're going to publish standards for evaluating if your gcode is a firearm or firearm part? THAT'S FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Supporters say the measure tackles the problem before a downloadable file becomes an untraceable weapon. Everytown for Gun Safety says recoveries of 3D-printed crime guns across 20 cities have risen nearly 1,000% over the past five years, and argues that cheaper, more capable printers are already being used in illegal ghost gun operations.

Ooooh, that's two large red flags for me (disregarding the litany of red flags the concept in general has). Every town being involved makes me question the data on its face, given the number of times I saw gang violence near a school out of school hours listed as a school shooting in their database, as does a large percentage increase with no hard numbers. If they recovered 1 gun last year and 11 this year, that's a 1000% increase, but the percentage sounds so much worse than the real number.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 64 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Good luck. Tough to pick a more DIY-oriented bunch of hobbyists who would rather build their own hardware and compile their own software over allowing their printer to narc on them to the government.

RepRap 2: Countersurveillance Boogaloo, launching soon.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›