Technology

85245 readers

4094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

619

Anthropic/OpenAI may be spending more than $1000 for every $100 you pay them (ea.rna.nl)

submitted 1 day ago by Trilogy3452@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

164 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 4) 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] bangupjobasusual@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I’m not going to read this whole article, is that opex??

[–] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (28 children)

So are we assuming here that LLMs won't become more efficient over time? GPT-3 has been a frontier model just a few years ago and it's performance blew everyone's mind at that time. I can now run equivalent LLM on my personal computer. Why can't we expect that after a few years Claude Sonnet level of capability won't be possible to accomplish locally?

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 3 points 1 day ago

It already happened, small language models are busy dragging their nutsack on frontier models, running on a macbook and costing nothing

Where's the fucking product, Sam?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why can’t we expect that after a few years Claude Sonnet level of capability won’t be possible to accomplish locally?

Because when you're old enough to remember what AIM chat it's could do 25 years ago, it stops being impressive what today's chatbots can do...

It's seems "new" because everyone hated it and it was just a novelty back then.

But if you read up on them, they did 90% of what modern ones do. And if they had access to today's computing, the only explanation for why they still suck so much, is that no one has ever wanted them.

The oligarchs just decided it didn't matter

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (26 replies)

load more comments