this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1063 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4440 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SecretiveVault@lemmy.zip 63 points 13 hours ago (9 children)
[–] Identikit@leminal.space 18 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

So many people asked “Why not Opera?” When I jumped off the AI browsers.

This. This is why. Didn’t trust em.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 8 hours ago

Whether you use Firefox or Librewolf you are entirely dependent on the hundreds of full timer developers Mozilla’s got working on the Gecko codebase.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

What's to stop the developers of a Chromium fork like Cromite from mainting MV2 compatibility themselves?

Cromite's only flaw (IMO) is that it based it's built in adblocker on AdBlock instead of Ublock.

I've tried moving to Firefox and I don't know, it just feels ugh to me. (scientific critique, I know...). It's just something I can't put my finger on; Firefox just doesn't feel performative. whether that's a frame-buffer animation thing, or icon shadows, or something else entirely, it just feels off to me in some uncally valley sort of way.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What’s to stop the developers of a Chromium fork like Cromite from mainting MV2 compatibility themselves?

It's a lot of work, mostly. And how many of those V2 extensions are going to continue to provide patches anyway.

it just feels off to me in some uncally valley sort of way.

Maybe it's the subliminal messages Google has been injecting over the years to make you avoid Firefox/non-chromium browsers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Performative is not the word you intended, but may be apt.

I've heard this from others but don't see meaningful difference myself

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 33 points 13 hours ago

Man up and take your spyware like an obedient peasant

[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 50 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Great.. I work in IT so this means MORE "virus" calls because you 100000000% need an adblocker on the web to stop those fake "your computer is being hacked" malicious advertisements from websites.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Time to polish those presentation skills and deliver a memo to your company, extolling the virtues of Firefox as a company-wide browser instead of the now malware inducing Chrome, Opera, and Edge.

[–] dwokimmortalus@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Wont happen. Security teams will block it still. Firefox blocks deep packet inspection which corporate security suites use for monitoring. Its the reason chrome is the default now in almost all companies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 40 points 14 hours ago

The enshittification is going on overdrive I see...

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 103 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

The browser wars have been kind of strange from the perspective of someone who's been using Firefox for well over a decade. It's a bit like hearing about the Civil War while living in Oregon.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lightlybutteredtoast@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Has anyone notice safari letting youtube ads through on iOS recently? (I also use AdGuard DNS on my phone, so I guess that's stopped working too)

[–] encelado748@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

AdGuard DNS

a DNS AdBlocker just stop a request to a specific domain. If youtube serves video and ads from the same server you do not know which one is an ads and which one is a video on the DNS level. Furthermore you have some devices hardcoding DNS server (google homes are common for calling google DNS directly instead of getting the DNS from the Router) which makes it very hard to use DNS level AdBlockers.

Google spends a lot of money mixing ads and legit content to make it impossible to block, it is not safari "letting ads through" is more like safari cannot identify ads anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

The ad games is always one of whack-a-mole; companies like Google have it in their best interest to find ways to get around ad blockers. The ad block developers then find newer ways to block ads, and the cycle continues.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›