this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1048 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4275 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Ublock was already somewhat neutered on Chrome, and people didn’t seem to notice. They keep using it.

I’m just so cynical these days. It’s not like the Windows XP era, where people eventually get fed up with enshittification, and move.

Google won. Facebook won.

They have absolute control, basically.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 minutes ago

At this point when someone complains about anything but Linux, I just bully them.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

At ~3.5% market share, depending on the statistics source. And declining, month-on-month:

https://radar.cloudflare.com/reports/browser-market-share-2025-q4

https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

And people still use these trash dumpster of a browser?

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 36 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Firefox and its derivatives (and Safari - sorry Apple users) are the only browsers not using Google's Blink web engine these days - at least until Ladybird is released.

Despite the Mozilla Foundation's many stupid decisions, Firefox (and Safari) is starting to look like the only thing stopping Google from completely controlling the internet.

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Not true — Safari is still based on WebKit. And Safari is still the default browser on over two and a half billion mobile devices currently in use. And say what you might about Apple, but at least they aren’t in the business of selling ads, and thus don’t have any business interest in allowing you to block them effectively, unlike Google.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Sure but that alternative doesn't work for anyone who already doesn't own an Apple device. Also those two and a half billion devices you mentioned can't run alt browsers due to Apple policy so you're basically just picking another company to hand complete control to.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] lethargicpuppy14@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 minutes ago

What's Lynx? A quick search gave me a lot of different things

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

For real though. I had the thought earlier today of how I could reduce my internet usage to text only and try and skip all the bullshit. Might be tough but I'm not seeing another way. At least I'd still be able to access things like Wikipedia.

Between AI killing the idea of "believe what you can see" and ads/tracking being forced on every part of the internet, the end is very, very near.

And it should upset everyone, because the internet was not designed for this. We (the people) ultimately paid to develop what is being taken over by corpos for profit.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 minutes ago

If not corporations' benefit, then whose?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

Links2 is not as funny to use, but it is easier to understand. It supports a graphical interface and images. I use it from time to time and it's nice when you know what you are looking for...

I used them cause my PC had 384 MB of RAM in 2012. It was ok for everything but surfing the web and lynx solved the issue.

If you are looking for something for the phone, i once used Vivaldi.

[–] drath@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

People keep mentioning Firefox but fail to realize that Google, as the sole sponsor of Mozilla Corporation (not to be confused with Mozilla Foundation), can just kindly ask for Firefox to follow suit and gimp itself, just like it did before with a move to webextensions. Gotta admit it, Google has won the web, what they say (eventually) goes.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Like how they killed JPEG-XL.

All over some employee’s ego associated with his AVIF contributions, from what I’ve seen.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Google doesn't even need to get their hands dirty like that. IMO all they need to do is continue making it difficult for companies to support Firefox when designing their websites. That, in addition to making sure companies know that Google is tirelessly working to make sure Chrome won't work with ad blockers is going to eventually kill Firefox completely.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Glass half full time:

Making adblockers available to only people on the far fringe that are going to go through the extraordinary hoops to get it to work makes it less important to stymie the act of adblocking, because far few people are doing it. Businesses half-ass everything and do the lowest cost thing like always, so they will not bother to ever commit token effort to stop the few remaining adblockers, making it trivially easy to perform the adblocking by comparison to today. The pendulum always swings, in everything, and one of the big factors that cause it to swing back even when all seems lost is that the current group or way of thinking that is at the forefront today has its group members get lazy and complacent in their superior position, creating opportunities for the opposition.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If there are no remaining mainstream browsers that support ad blockers that pendulum is going to take a long time to swing back.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Necessity is the mother of invention. Now they're basically making us work on it. Sometimes loud obvious actions like this are the catalyst to more drastic response. Everything often seems to always stay the same, but everything stays the same up until the very second it doesn't. Nobody knows when that will be, but it will be.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

then we'll move again, like we did with chrome. this game of cat and mouse is easy to keep up and really only serves to harm these company in the long run.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Except they aren’t moving anymore.

I think Google finally trapped most of the web’s population, for good.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago

This. The number of people (real people, not internet people) I know who just keep using Chrome or other Google products without care is shocking.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

That's they're choice is all I'll say, I know plenty went to fire for for these reasons, it stands to reason they'll do it again.

[–] CarpalTunnelButt@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EtzBetz@feddit.org 41 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

Just use Firefox (or Zen Browser, which is a nice fork of Firefox)

[–] UsoSaito@feddit.uk 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago

I counter with IronFox! Lol I just enjoy all the alternativeFox options

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›