this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1091 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4242 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 60 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

When will marketing people figure out our generation views ads as hostile, non-consensual, and unwanted? They are a negative way to introduce us to your product/service. I actively avoid things with obnoxious ads. Native, old spice, liberty mutual, all of those brands the first thing that comes to mind is the negative experience of an invasive advertisement I never fucking asked for.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Apparently not, as ads keep selling.

I hate to sound so cynical, but many folks are gullible. They’ll trust a flashy ad because it looks nice to them, and gives them a positive emotional response, and then internalize that judgement as their own decision (so when someone comes to challenge it, they take it personally).

It’s not just old people living in another time, either. I’ve watched teenagers and young adults trust obviously-sponsored influencers like they’re friends. Or wear brands as status symbols.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 37 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Except we are not customers, and it's the customers that are important. I's like cows asking between themselves when will the butcher realize that they do not like being killed for meat.

Butcher knows, but butcher doesn't sell comfort to cows, he sells meat to customers.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Ads aren't always there to get you to buy something specific. In fact, an ad you don't interact with is a better ad because they don't have to pay for click-through.

You don't want to buy brand A because they have ads, so you buy brand B instead, but both widgets are owned by the same holding company. Or they're made in the same factory. Or they use the same components. Or they have the same shareholders. Any way you slice it, the same rich assholes are getting your money.

The goal of the Ads is to put a bug in your head and get you to buy something.

And that's just the Ads. The tracking is also (increasingly primarily) about political manipulation and surveillance.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

When will marketing people figure out our generation views ads as hostile, non-consensual, and unwanted?

Who knows. I was at the beach this past weekend and there were two different planes flying ad banners in front of me.

What the fuck. That's two different local businesses that I have noted I will actively avoid.

Can't even unplug and face a clear sky without getting ads shoved in your fucking face.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Because it works and makes them money, and people end up buying the products.

What they really need is an option to leave ads or remove them. The ones that want ads gone aren't buying your product, and the ones that like ads like to see new products. Just give us options. The options are usually to pay for the service and get no ads, or get the service for free and you get ads.

Where people get mad is when you have to pay for an ad supported plan.

All this doesn't really work in the real world anyways, because YouTube offers both an ad free plan, and a free supported plan, and yet everyone still complains about having to pay for ad free. So the war continues.

Btw i pay for YouTube premium, and every ad free streaming service because i support the ad free plans and hope they continue to exist.

[–] GMac@feddit.org 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure all generations feel the same way.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

IMHO all of our advertising talent died in 9/11. Ads used to be a lot cooler, funnier, and higher effort during the days of antenna broadcast television.

This comment may cause dizziness, vomiting, loose stools, tight stools, depression, memory loss, birth defects, memory loss, and sudden death. Consult your doctor before reading this far.

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter how we view them as long as they work.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago

They're too busy milking the boomers for now (and even then, the smart ones also despise ads already)

[–] baner@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

What generation?