this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
516 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86930 readers
3095 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under-16s will be banned from using social media, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced.

Starmer says social media is making children unhappy, making it easier for bullies to abuse children, and is "designed to be addictive". A ban would give children more time, security, and more freedom to grow up - as well as more opportunities, he adds.

"That is all any parent wants. They want to know that Britain will be better for their children, that they will get a fair chance," the PM says in a speech in Downing Street.

Starmer adds that the government is "not prepared to compromise" on the safety and happiness of children - and that includes in the regulation and enforcement of this ban. He says the government has listened to and learned from countries like Australia, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why stop at 16

Get rid of all of it

We never needed it anyway

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

People better start remembering the 5th of November real soon.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if the goal was to actually protect kids, it wouldn't be a problem.

however, this isn't supposed to protect kids, it's supposed to protect corpofascists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Domi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

give children more time, security, and freedom to go up

So can trans kids access puberty blockers now or nah?

[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

The streets are getting dangerous, it's forbidden to go outside

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Anything to avoid parents actually .... parenting their children. Just like making weed illegal stopped everyone from smoking it! :D Same with alcohol.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Typical. Punish the individual, but don't ever address the underlying social causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Thousands of people are already getting arrested every year in the UK over social media posts. Good thing the government cares so much about “protecting the children”, because their parents won’t be able to from jail if they say anything the Epstein class doesn’t like, especially now that every post will be conveniently linked to a verified identity. 🙄

[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

“Thousands”…

Don’t do Musk’s propaganda job for him. The far-right are doing well enough in the UK without people like you amplifying their lies for them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lavaparrot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where and when can I protest this in-person?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kuma@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think this is a very interesting topic. How can you verify that someone is of age without the problem with privacy?

Would you go to a kiosk or something and buy a code that is not bound to you as a person but the person who works there have verified that you are over 16? So it will kinda be like a steam code except they need to check your actual age with a valid identification (that is only shown to the person) and that code will be bound to an account when claimed. If it is per account then that could also make it annoying for kids to create multiple accounts if they aren't of age.

How else could you do it without needing to trust someone to keep your identity safe?

Throw your ideas at me!

And we do not need perfect, look at alcohol consumptions, that is illegal for kids but some find their ways anyway. It just needs to be annoying so most don't do it or do it less

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A better example for me is driving, we don't let children drive, millions of children have access to cars, there's no age gate on the ignition.

Ultimately its the parents that stop kids driving.

Ban kids from using it. Then treat it like a public health problem and educate everybody on the problems, how to identify misinformation, keep themselves safe etc. And require the companies to provide the tools parents can use to protect their own kids. Parental controls exist but i feel they aren't widely used because it's difficult and complicated.

I'd go further and start regulating the use of algorithmic feeds for everybody but that's probably harder to achieve.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Why protect the children from rape gangs and stabbings when you can protect them from youtube and tiktok instead.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] arararagi@ani.social 6 points 1 month ago

Considering youths are the most prone to protest, this is not about their protection at all

[–] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

70% of Australian children get around the ban. And besides: https://blog.rebeltechalliance.org/sm-ban-bad-idea/

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny how this is being imposed on the population at large, but the same politicians pushing it are exempt. So self-sacrificing that they will put their children and grandchildren in peril to protect ours. They're heroes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the same politicians pushing it are exempt

Because they're all over 16?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] berno@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Fuck Keir Starmer

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›