this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
178 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85420 readers
3751 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under-16s will be banned from using social media, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced.

Starmer says social media is making children unhappy, making it easier for bullies to abuse children, and is "designed to be addictive". A ban would give children more time, security, and more freedom to grow up - as well as more opportunities, he adds.

"That is all any parent wants. They want to know that Britain will be better for their children, that they will get a fair chance," the PM says in a speech in Downing Street.

Starmer adds that the government is "not prepared to compromise" on the safety and happiness of children - and that includes in the regulation and enforcement of this ban. He says the government has listened to and learned from countries like Australia, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toebert@piefed.social 30 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I just wonder who the hell is asking for this from the population? Out of all the things that are being brought up as issues on either side (like immigrants, trans rights, energy, housing crisis, the wars etc) I've never seen this being brought up as the thing anyone has wanted.

How have we reached this level of "democracy" where even protesting is banned..

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

Capitalism always trends toward fascism, this is nothing new.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notabot@piefed.social 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

This is quite popular amongst parents where I am. There's also a big local push to avoid kids having smartphones before they're 13. Hopefully by that point they're mature enough to have a better understanding of what they're being exposed to, and are better equiped to know when to turn to an adult if something is upsetting or worrying them online.

Notably this isn't about restricting access to the internet, as kids have many other ways to get online at home, school, a friend's house, or even the library. Instead it's about ensuring they aren't exposing themselves to things they aren't ready for without an adult to guide them.

ETA: A lot of kids are pretty keen on this too, especially if they have had a bad experience online. The idea that none of their peers has a smartphone or social media means there's less peer pressure too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why protect the children from rape gangs and stabbings when you can protect them from youtube and tiktok instead.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world -3 points 3 hours ago (7 children)

Why not both? Social media has had a negative effect on the youth, it sucks.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They might as well just introduce an umbrella 'won't somebody please think of the children act'. They're moving very quickly from porn to social media, and the slope is starting to feel real slippery.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 0 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

On the other hand everyone think that social media are dangerous for the children so something need to be done.

I am afraid that you cannot have children protection without some sort of control

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It’s be great if it was actual practicable.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

People better start remembering the 5th of November real soon.

[–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr -1 points 6 hours ago (7 children)
[–] LordDaveTheKind@piefed.social -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Agree. And any professional working or dealing with children would agree.

And, for anyone who is telling: "lEt ThE pArEnTs dO tHaT!!11|!!", please put yourself in that situation. Would your parents have been able to set rigorous and effective checks on the media you accessed in your youth? And even if so, the conditions in which a teenager lives today are different than the ones you experienced: average time spent with families is decreasing, the average time that teenagers spend in touch with their peers (not necessarily in person, but also via IM) is increasing, and therefore also the peer pressure. Also, what about those kids with absent parents? What about those kids with toxic or incompetent parents?

Sure, I agree with anyone who says that kids should be guided and assisted on social media in the right environments, or in a way to find the right spaces to express themselves (with hobbies, sports, group activities, whatever), and I’ll vote for anyone who could do anything on that purpose. But we can also imagine flying cars at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It changed the perspective on American imperialism and Israel for at least one generation in the US so I understand these villainous moves. Gotta keep Western narratives alive and unchallenged or else the dummies might wake up!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›