FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then the UN should start their own starlink-like company. Nothing is stopping them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

SpaceX and starlink have had very little success the last few years? What have you been smoking?!

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 week ago (11 children)

You don’t nationalise a company (SpaceX) just because the existing government owned company (NASA) is significantly worse. What do you think would happen to SpaceX if they did nationalise it? Lol. It would go to hell, like NASA.

The government should not be responsible for things like this. The government should provide services for necessities for human rights and general standards of living, but they shouldn’t take over successful companies just because they couldn’t do it themselves.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just because something is a “utility” it doesn’t mean that the government should own and run it lol.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

These things only exist and are as good as they are because they’re not government owned and run.

Look at NASA compared to SpaceX to see why this would be an absolutely terrible move. Government is where projects like these go to die, while making every politician and contractor involved filthy rich.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 week ago

YouTube didn’t publicly make that claim though, so they haven’t done any defamation.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 week ago

If you’re not playing on a VRR display 45fps *will * be horrible and stuttery. 30fps locked would feel significantly better.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Almost every person I’ve had an argument/discussion with who goes through my past comments to try and find things to use against me when they’re losing has been someone who goes back and deleted all of their comments. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 week ago

No, mostly because online games don’t have credits because you don’t “beat” them, but also because why on earth would I? What would I possibly get from it?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I addressed them first by saying that with decentralised there are just *more * mods who can and will ban you unfairly and with no recourse, and other mods/admin who literally get to decide what instances you can even see in the first place. Most of them just defederate from any instance that doesn’t highly censor views they don’t like. Many already decided to defederate from any meta instances that ever join the fediverse ffs.

Lemmy moderation is even more authoritarian because of how Lemmy started in the first place, and then because of the mods who moved from Reddit to here. They hated that their power was taken away on Reddit so they jumped ship and now get to make their own rules without having to answer to Reddit admins.

If you don’t ban people they don’t need to create multiple accounts. You just block and move on and they’ll continue doing their thing while you don’t see it. Win-win.

You’re a typical “everyone I disagree with is a Nazi bigot” who craves censorship and authoritarian leadership because you can’t handle people having differing opinions by the looks of it. You talk as if “Nazis” are everywhere lol. If you can’t even be in the same virtual space as a “nazi” without losing your mind the issue is with you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›