World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
I’m suggesting they have never heard of them, being the reason they are so quick to side with the destroying a culture. I suppose you would have agreed with forcing the Native Americans to learn English and participate in the white society. I also suppose you agree with forcing The Australian aboriginal people to learn English.
You are making some wild jumps in logic.
Learning another language is not "destroying a culture", this is a dog whistle of hardcore conservatives who are afraid of diversity. What would be destroying a culture, would be forcefully restricting the use of the native languages, such as forbidding the use of the native languages in schools. But I am not aware of this happening, nor was I arguing in support of that in any way.
Also, justifying a curriculum choice in schools is a far leap from justification of colonialism. I am very much against the forced subjugation of native peoples, but that is not the topic.
overall good points, but I'd like to expand on the one about forbidding languages at educational institutions:
a ban isn't even necessary to expediate the decline of a language; it's often enough to simply defund it.
teachers need funding, and simply not giving any to other languages or other cultural curriculum is effectively the same as a ban.
few schools and administrations would shoulder the costs of "extra" curriculum, because few have the funds to do so, particularly when it comes to minorities...
source: am part of such a minority (in central europe though) and our state actually sponsors extra language classes, courses, and cultural clubs, activities, and events in order to preserve our unique identity and culture.
it's still trending towards extinction though, as such minorities tend to do...
tl;dr: no need for a ban, just withhold a bit of funding and it will die out within a few generations...
That's fair, but it assumes that mandating one language means that the other language will be defunded. Is that happening here? I think ideally both languages (national language, native language) would be funded and studied
You know nothing of what is going on, admittedly, and yet you somehow want to support it.
I suppose it was cool for the English to force the Aboriginal Australians to assimilate? Or, are you going to say that’s fake? Western Propaganda?
Did you read my messages at all? As stated, I very much oppose the colonisation and forced subjugation and assimilation of native peoples, including in Australia. But I do not think that English being a mandatory subject in Australia is a bad thing.
Is the idea of someone knowing more than one language, so foreign to you?
So at a certain point, after all the subjugation has eliminated most of the native people, the remaining natives should probably learn the language of their oppressors?
You’re amazing.
The actual struggles of the uhigurs is entirely alien to either what western media makes up or just imagining China is copying western imperialism despite having different material pressures.
Uhigurs? Yeah, you can’t even respect them enough to spell it right. I’m not taking your advice.
Here are the alternate spellings. Earn that fifty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghurs
Its not an english word lmao would you rather I spell it using the alphabet they use?
bold move for you to criticize me for assuming someone can’t pronounce it when you can’t even spell it.
You lost all credibility. Better luck next time.
The person who lived in Urumqi is more credible.
Cool story bro. 🐸🤡
I have pictures
I don’t click links to random photos that you can’t prove are real. Stop embarrassing yourself.
My god… you really like to embarrass yourself in public. Is this a kink?
Continue closing your eyes and covering your ears lmao
Like you? No thanks.
"No u" doesnt really make sense when you're talking to someone who saw with their own eyes
Your biased opinion means nothing when your criticism was my assumption they know very little, which they admitted to later. And then, you showed you knew even less because you cannot even spell it—and let’s be real, you don’t give a shit how it’s spelled.
Bye