this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
246 points (97.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47915 readers
863 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m seeing a bunch of posts insinuating that this most recent assassination attempt was fake. Why do people think this? I’m out of the loop.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

the way his ear looked after the first one, how incompetent the shooters were etc, theres lots of things flying around in comments

~~AfaIk, the wound on his ear was caused by a member of Secret Service, not by a glancing shot (although he claimed).~~

Edit: According to Wikipedia, the final stance now is that the wound was caused by a stray bullet.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There was no ear wound. His ear has no marks on it.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Source: Look at him, and then look at anyone else who has ever had an ear injury.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

I'm guessing you have examples? I don't see anything I wouldn't expect in the closeup in https://www.nickiswift.com/1909492/plastic-surgeon-trump-ear-injury-one-year-after-butler-shooting/

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

You should look up how Epstein abused Wikipedia.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Edit: According to Wikipedia, the final stance now is that the wound was caused by a stray bullet

Okay if we assume thst to be true then why did the kid get killed? Do you think 17 year olds agree to sacrifice themselves for Donald Trump, being reviled among his voterbase for the rest of history and seen as the latest Lee Harvey Oswald ?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

They set people up all the time.

"Here's some money. Buy me drugs bro. You're under arrest!!"

"Oh, you're pissed off at your wife? Well what are the odds? I know a hitman!"

"So you want to die huh? Why not go out as a hero? The president will be at this location and this door will be lightly guarded. Thanks for saving your country!"

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Theres probs a bunch of explanations out there

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Edit: According to Wikipedia, the final stance now is that the wound was caused by a stray bullet.

No link provided, so I looked it up. It's in the article Attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Pennsylvania, under Shooting (pretty deep in there though):

The upper part of Trump's right ear was grazed by the first bullet Crooks fired.^[99][100][101]^

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Note that Crooks is the name of the attempted assassin, not the secret service. He fired at him so I would not call it a stray bullet.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

sauce? there is zoomed-in footage of blood soon after the audible batch of shots.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

zoomed-in footage of blood

You don't get 'nicked' in the ear by a bullet and then are just fine 3 days later. The bow wave on the bullet will tear pieces off, and even trivial damage to the cartilage will be visible for weeks after.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't remember Trump as being "just fine". I remember a very visible bandage on his ear for weeks.

Edit: Am I wrong? His bandage at the Republican Convention was all over the news and a MAGA fashion trend. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4795636-trump-without-bandage-ear/ 26-13 days is two weeks.

And though the https://www.nickiswift.com/1909492/plastic-surgeon-trump-ear-injury-one-year-after-butler-shooting/ article is tabloid, it has a great closeup of the war. See it for yourself how obviously wrong the ear looks a year after it was shot. No evidence has been presented that he was "just fine".

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The final conclusion says, it was a stray bullet and not harsh treatment by the Secret Service.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

where can I find this final conclusion?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Aatube@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

thanks. I'm still confused by how people call it a "stray bullet" though; it was the attempted assassin's bullet aimed at Trump and hit Trump although not in the temple intended. To be a stray bullet the target would've been someone other than Trump.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Either the bullet hit something other with a hard surface and was deflected on it's trajectory, then I'd call it a stray bullet, or it was a glancing shot that has missed the head and only hit the ear.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't see anything to suggest it was deflected rather than a straight path

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Then, I'd call it a glancing shot and not a stray bullet.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

It was a chip from the teleprompter.