this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
94 points (73.3% liked)

Linux

66816 readers
209 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Methio@jlai.lu 146 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Just note how the guy starts with "only Microsoft numbers can be trusted" is biased bullshit. Pretending a company will give true numbers at all time, is a big lie. If anything they will inflate numbers and they'd try to hide the truth as much as they can because investors are watching.

While there will be truth in bots taking a part of the traffic, the whole article is Microsoft bootlicker talk.

Taking another random tool that seems to filter bot for results is just him trying to get a confirmation for his bias.

Yes a 10% stat at a given time by a given measurement tool, is not equal to a true 10% userbase. Yes there are bots. Yes there are Linux and Windows zombies alike.

Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.

This isn't entirely true. Linux is getting a lot of help from Microsoft.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 hours ago

They say every million in Microsoft ad spend is a quarter point in Linux desktop share.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 days ago

To be fair...

This is 'windowslatest.com'.

Totally agree with you, but... the bias ... was foreshadowed, lol.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

FWIW this website is always like this, every article I've read from latest feels like it came from the MS PR desk.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wonder why that could be, rofl!

Surely MSFT would always be clear, transparent, and forthright with the public, ahahahaha!

[–] Kristof@scribe.disroot.org 13 points 2 days ago

Trust that Microsoft will give true numbers, wink wink

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just note how the guy starts with "only Microsoft numbers can be trusted" is biased bullshit.

I would argue misquoting someone to fit your argument is more a egregious example of "biased bullshit".

Only Microsoft or OEM partners can tell you with the highest accuracy how many people use Windows now versus five years ago.

This is literally true. They're not saying they WILL tell you the accurate numbers, they're saying only they have those numbers to tell.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I own 6 Windows Professional licenses. I am presently using two. You really think Microsoft are the ones to trust?

Having numbers others don't doesn't make those numbers useful or true in every context.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

No. No one is telling anyone to "trust Microsoft", no one is saying "the numbers Microsoft reports are true". That is a quote the guy above invented from thin air.

Edit: but for the record, it would be lawsuit territory for MSFT to actually publish false numbers. The shareholders would absolutely ream them. They're allowed to not post numbers, but they're not allowed to post false numbers.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

They don't have to publish false numbers. Just keep vague which numbers they are posting. "Total active licenses" was what I referenced earlier.