this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
1017 points (97.7% liked)

memes

22240 readers
2993 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you, as a consumer, directly paid one of the illegal tariffs, you can get a refund via the shipper who acted as an agent for you.

For example, here's the form if you shipped something over the border using UPS and paid an illegal tariff to get it released from customs.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neat. I paid a business that forwarded the costs to me. Who do I appeal to?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends probably on the nature of what "forwarded the costs" means.

If the business collected the costs from you and then forwarded them to CBP while acting as your agent, then you can demand a refund from them or sue them.

If you agreed to purchase goods for one price while also agreeing to pay a separate "tariff reimbursement fee" in exchange for purchasing the goods, you're probably shit out of luck.

Various shades in between might be arguable or litigatable one way or another.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do Amazon receipts have “extra tariff fee” as a line item?

no, the prices are technically unrelated to tariffs.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Yes, technically the truth. In practice the vast vast majority of consumers bought from a business that imported the item. So it's good to highlight people have options, but the broad point of the post stands, that the businesses have the option of pocketing the difference and most of them seem to be taking that option.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does this mean UPS is going to stop sending me demand letters for extra money on a thing I already bought, paid for and received?

I keep wondering if they’ll escalate, but I’m refusing on principle.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you already received your item(s) and you don't immediately need to do any more business with them, it sounds like they don't have a lot of leverage to get you to pay.

Sounds like that might have been a screw up on their part.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe they thought it was like income tax, which the government will enforce even if you already got your stuff (money.)

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That doesn’t matter if you paid inflated prices on already imported goods.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the comment conveniently seems to forget that most people paid tariff costs not by directly importing something, but by simply buying the thing at a tariff inflated price in a store.

There's no refund for those, and that is where the largest part of tariff costs has been paid.