jj4211

joined 2 years ago
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

One thing is that America hasn't given a new presidency to the same party that held the office since the 1980s, at there's already a tendency to waffle back and forth.

Trump got through the GOP primaries by virtue of energizing the racist hateful folks that people like McCain famously tried to talk down.

With the general election, people were miffed about Bernie, polling told them they could safely sit it out and Trump would still lose, and frankly people didn't think Trump would be that terrible, even if they didn't like him.

His first term made us a laughing stock and inflicted injustice at the border, but was mostly milquetoast otherwise until the pandemic, which tanked any chance at the election

Then various things contributed to a terrible economy with Biden, so people voted for "different", and hey, Trump was not great but, pandemic aside, domestic situation wasn't so bad..

So now here we are, an administration totally off the leash...

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's a good point, also if you can compare like to like conditions and what the data does if you exclude teen drivers. Also if you can identify incidents related to bald tires and brake failures that wouldn't apply.

Also would be interesting to compare human augmented driving miles to full autonomous miles. With the automated emergency braking/collision alert/lane centering assist. Anecdotally was teaching my teen to drive. Suddenly a car pulls out right in front of us, zero warning. If that happened to me, with experience on a formerly normal car, I'm pretty sure I would've wrecked. However my kids reflex to swerve triggered the cars "evasive steering assist" and did an action movie worthy maneuver, avoiding going off into the ditch and returning just right into the lane after getting around the other car.

Thing about autonomous driving is that it seems to get the stupid easy stuff wrong in dangerous ways, but if you have a demanding precise maneuver to make, it has a better chance once that maneuver is needed.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The challenge is one approach only needs to modify the transit infrastructure. The other means having to tear down and build new commercial and residential properties and force people and businesses to relocate in order to have a vaguely sane transit system. My area desperately wanted to do transit but even with rather significant hypothetical funding, they could only service about 10-15% of typical trips. They've settled on a plan that is much less money, but only serves like 5% of trips. To go with that plan, they are making restrictions around zoning to force mid density mixed use construction only, favoring one of the two chosen transit corridors.

They are trying but just people are distributed very awkwardly for mass transit.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Let's put it this way. If you knew a person, and that person just had their fourth crash in 8 years having driven 160k miles, would you think "this person is a bad driver" or would you think "they only crashed 4 times, let's see where this goes".

Especially if you've seen this driver drive in the wrong lane, go straight in a turn only lane, and other dodgy maneuvers regularly.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

A small sample size would just make the prediction highly uncertain, could be way better or way worse.

However others have made the observation that it's reasonable to consider the miles driven as the sample size, and at over 300,000 miles, it is a bit more credible sounding.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Funny part was that tesla taxis also had a human attendant, but for the sake of appearance made them sit on the passenger side. They deliberately limited staff from being able to interact with steering and pedals.

They eventually moved those to the driver seat.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Going by inflation adjusted market cap values, it certainly looks like the financial facet of the AI companies alone are bigger than both those events.... This is going to be beyond messy...

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

The issue is that as dumb as it is, SATA ssds are still a big part of the consumer market.

Even though nvme isn't appreciably more expensive to make, it's still used as a "premium" product., and SATA is a product tier to capture budget market whole protecting their more premium market.

This move is a clear symptom of the real issue. Manufacturers shifting as much capacity as possible towards big datacenter buildouts at the expense of starving every other market for these products. Trillions of dollars that will pay whatever it takes competing with a more rational market

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So our utility came out and said they have to raise residential rates by a rather large amount, largely because so many data centers are demanding so much power they need to upgrade, so residential rates have to fund that..

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Well the explanation would work for one election, 2024.

In 2016, he was a terrible choice on so many fronts, but no especially strong reason to expect he would dramatically shift inflation or pay. And on those specific metrics, his first term was mostly typical, except pandemic, which people can believe to be an utterly freak event beyond anyone's control if they still wanted to vote for Trump.

The global economic shock continued and was exasperated by war. Biden had little to do with it, but it was on his watch, so he gets saddled with blame, so to the extent a voter just thinks about their personal economic situation, they vote for "not the current leadership".

So this term has been marked by utterly predictable economic problems that everyone told them would happen, but they didn't have first hand experience to trust that, and Trump's rhetoric resonated with the "I know smart people say it doesn't work, but 'common sense' tells me get rid of immigrants and tariff all imports and things will be great, making American jobs and getting rid of foreigners taking the jobs".

So now they get to see first hand why those common sense thoughts don't actually work.

Still. I predict next year they'll roll back tariffs to try to create a bit of deflation and also cut checks to everyone to make them feel like winners in the moment as they decide midterms.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, the government that was accused of abducting a family is in the right, because that same government says they are treating that family well, and no, no one is allowed to independently verify that, but obviously you have every reason to take our word for it

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Whatever the situation is in Venezula, it's not going to be a good thing for America to get entangled.

Hussein was a pretty bad dude, but our intervention in Iraq ultimately was bad for America and didn't exactly make things in Iraq better.

view more: next ›