jj4211

joined 2 years ago
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

And the USA gets real pain.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Given how much they hate being "woke", does that mean "sleepy Joe" was actually a compliment?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Oh certainly I think they imagine the likelihood of a full way is low, not fall to recognize the likelihood of a more surgical clandestine op which absolutely could have a high chance of success even from one of the less resourced adversaries they are pissing off.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Note that violent means only had 4%. So 13% wouldn't mind a peaceful purchase. Which is still dumb but at least not as outright insane as Stephen Miller would go.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know if that's "doing" anytime. It's all rhetoric.

They also said all sorts of stuff about curbing his actions in Venezuela but when it came time to vote they couldn't even get it to need a veto.

Maybe violating European sovereignty is a bridge enough to actually pass something, but I expect them to just let the veto happen

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Frankly, I don't see anyone domestically going to the ammo box over Greenland or nearly any foreign situation. That's one of those things people will do soap box or ballot box, but not ammo box.

The existence of the ballot box mollifies people, that nice, safe and easy mechanism is far preferred over the work or risk of the ammo box. I fear the project 2025 fall to understand this and will trigger people to the ammo box by denying them the ballot box, but at least in the moment this would be more of a voting thing.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Hey look, the "civics" lessons in the South are oddly favoring conservative talking points...

Historically tests for voting competency have not been to ensure educated voters, but to disenfranchise groups. You don't want to open that door.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I've seen enough of the die hard maga folks talk that I see why authoritarianism appeals. It's annoying to think and if someone just simplifies the world for them, they find that much more appealing.

To scrutinize the actions of their leader is just too much work, so they just slip into the comfortable position of "this is my guy, I agree with whatever he says, even if I were to be even vaguely at odds with him, is just because he is better than me and accepting whatever is just the right call"

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Some say their amygdala grew three sizes that day.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

That you can't plug into a traditional computer and that has not even pads for a video connector to be soldered to.

Folks just don't realize how exotically different they have ultimately made the GPU packaging for datacenters. B200/B300 come in very specific packaging that is nowhere near a PCIe card.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Broadly speaking, the private keys can be protected.

For ssh, ssh-agent can retain the viable form for convenience while leaving the ssh key passphrase encrypted on disk. Beyond that your entire filesystem should be further encrypted for further offline protection.

Passkeys as used in webauthn are generally very specifically protected in accordance with the browser restrictions. For example, secured in a tpm protected storage, and authenticated by pin or biometric.

view more: next ›