this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
113 points (90.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49421 readers
397 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: My own solution: when it happens, get off the computer and pet the dog.


So let's say I make a point on a post. I put forward my argument and I support it with evidence.

Now let's say the first comment is from someone who disagrees with me, but seems to fundamentally misunderstand what I am saying, probably because they read the title of the post and immediately posted the first thing that came to mind.

But my fear, acquired from Reddit, is that people are going to read this guy's totally inaccurate presentation of my argument and then every comment in the rest of the discussion will proceed as if that's what I said.

And since, as we all know, fear leads to hate, my first instinct is just to berate this person for being a stupid moron.

This is a bad strategy. Not only is probably against Lemmy rules, it automatically makes me the bad guy.

So: question: how do I handle this person without tediously restating my position again, which is extremely irritating because I already wrote it once and they didn't read it the first time. What I want is to say something that quickly quarantines the misreading comment in people's minds so the misreading doesn't infect the entire thread.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You said, "your answer kind of proves the point to me." I was asking what it was that I said and what point it proved.

I was worried maybe such a brief question would be interpreted as hostile, but you had assured me the atypical people, of which you claimed to be, don't think that way, that it is is merely an annoying trait of NTs.

I'm starting to think that maybe you are over-interpreting autism into this context. Not that double-bind communication doesn't exist (thank you for sharing that, btw), but on-line we do away with much of the bother of non-verbal communication (as well as the ability to easily skip over boring conversations and the ability to obliquely reference shit knowing SOMEONE is going to get it), so there is much more parity between NT and atypical people.

I say this as someone with over 1k/comments Lemmy a month after having been here two months, and after having done all my "socializing" on line all my life--but it usually amounts to just this, having a series of one-off conversations with strangers, and it's the best I can do, socially.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey, thanks for continuing. I have to say, you're possibly right with overthinking. That's what we do. And hence, we often jump around to the point of getting lost in our own line of thinking - the latter being exactly what happened.

I am now trying to read through the fragments and have a very hard time following myself. If we were sitting together it might be easier, doing this asynchronous is hard work. So thanks for putting up with that and your effort.

Let me do some jumping around mobile and desktop and see of I can follow up.

Follow up edit:

OK I found where we disconnected. So I answered your op question basically and included autism and thought of that as self contained answer as if it was clear.

So it's kind of meta and apologies for that, it is convoluted. Having deep(er) knowledge of something one tends to miss out explanation of these things, which adds to the issue.

So the connection to autism with misunderstandings lies in autism itself, this literally are the social difficulties which are documented in medical papers.

Now, what might throw you off is the expected 'that happens to everyone'...and while that is true it's one of the discussions we have regularly. It's just on a totally different level.

Its complicated. But it is there, and I didn't want to hijack your topic or cause bother.

And while this explanation might likely be 'eh' for you, don't worry, hopefully you'll never have to worry much about it in your life and that's perfectly fine.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago

No worries. I discovered the autism lemmy and think I have broad phenotype autism, so I'm always interested in learning more.

I worked at a tech place and got along with everyone there. I thought it meant I was likable and it just different places are going to have different vibes, but someone pointed out tech people tend towards autism, so maybe all that was happening was that I find myself with a group of people who naturally shared my communication style... and that, basically still, I'm unlikable.