this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
-13 points (34.9% liked)

Programming

28194 readers
285 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
UlrikHD@programming.dev
bugsmith@programming.dev
Spyro@programming.dev
-13
Torvalds: AI Is the New Compiler, Not the New Programmer - “100% of their code Is written by compilers too" (pbxscience.com)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At the Linux Foundation’s Open Source Summit, the Linux creator argued that AI-written code claims are misleading — and warned that a wave of low-quality, AI-generated bug reports is quietly burning out the maintainers who keep open source running.

[...]

Speaking on stage, Torvalds said the framing misses an obvious historical parallel. Compilers have translated essentially all shipped source code into machine code for decades, he noted, yet no engineer describes their software as “compiler-written.” AI, in his view, belongs in the same category — a powerful productivity layer sitting on top of human design and understanding, not a replacement for it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artwork@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

@HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org , may I ask why do you change the title so awfully it does not only not state the same as the article but misleads it?

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Agreed. This post's current title does not appear in the link, and the link does not contain a quote that can be remotely matched to this post's title.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

and the link does not contain a quote that can be remotely matched to this post’s title.

That's not the case - first part pharaphrases Torvalds, second part cites him.

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Torvalds was careful to frame this as a correction of language rather than a rejection of the technology itself.

You "paraphrased" into oblivion the very thing Mr. Torvalds was trying to be careful about, contorting it into click bait rather than the nuance that he and the article are trying to get across.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

From the article:

Speaking on stage, Torvalds said the framing misses an obvious historical parallel. Compilers have translated essentially all shipped source code into machine code for decades, he noted, yet no engineer describes their software as “compiler-written.” AI, in his view, belongs in the same category — a powerful productivity layer sitting on top of human design and understanding, not a replacement for it.Linux & Unix

“When I see people saying, ‘Hey, 99% of our code is written by AI,’ I literally get angry, because those same people — I can pretty much guarantee — that 100% of their code is written by compilers.”

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)