this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
29 points (69.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

5100 readers
289 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, you again hahahah.

Anyways, you are putting out hyperbole. She's not facing 18 months. They are pressing some small charges against her and some other protestors, and the max prison time could be 18 months.

Still bullshit, but they'd have to make the charges stick first, which will require video evidence.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

She's not facing 18 months. They are pressing some small charges against her and some other protestors, and the max prison time could be 18 months.

Every news article I’ve ever read that contained the phrase ‘facing [x] months in prison’ chose the maximum possible sentence for x. That’s just what that phrase is meant to convey, that the law allows for a punishment as high as [x] months.

Example: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/congresswoman-8-months-pregnant-facing-120000922.html

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm still almost certain that's incorrect.... I'm used to seeing "facing up to" to describe a maximum...

Yahoo again: Man faces up to 54 years to life in prison

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It is a small .world out there.

There is video evidence but it is her being assaulted by the police officer with his bicycle. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/fkrKgq9XI_0?t=0m20s

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Thanks for the link! Evidence that she doesn't deserve those charges.