this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
144 points (93.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

44404 readers
520 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everything about CEOs is like a monarchy. Wealth inheritance in business families like the Waltons? Just the capitalism version of royal heirs getting their throne. Presidents? They don't run jackshit ever since money got into politics

America is back in the era of kings, and arguably a worse one

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The French revolution had an answer for this and it's easy to build but we'll need lots more baskets than they did.

[–] deadalus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or, and hear me out here, we attach a wood chipper right below where the basket would've been

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Naw, let's use another French-named device, the trebuchet. I can see it now... CHOP, LAUNCH! CHOP, LAUNCH! CHOP, LAUNCH! So satisfying.

[–] deadalus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think a trebuchet would take too long to load tbh

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We can keep them all in stockades while they wait their turn, then we can have some time to mock and jeer, or jeer and mock, if that's your thing.

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

This is the way.

two trebuchets!

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah i was thinking we might be able to use them as manure to replant everything they destroyed but i can't think of anything that would grow in such low quality, toxic manure and it's not like there's that much brain matter to use for anything else.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I am really disturbed how fast and nonchalant people come up with murder of groups or single people they don't like or have a grudge against. Killing people is always bad, always the wrong solution.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Humans evolved like that as a survival strategy. Even before agriculture was invented, if someone of the tribe was hoarding resources or being aggressive, there's strong evidence the rest of the tribe grouped up to either shun them completely or beat the offender to death.

Evidently, ignoring that survival strategy has led to a massive host of problems, and progress has only been seen made after violent solutions were done.

France for example improved after the first revolution. Of course, this eventually got worse again, but then more revolutions course corrected. It seems humans require this course correction over multiple times continuously, but as long as its applied, things do improve over time.

Perhaps one day, with enough self corrections, we'll arrive to a point where violence against societal offenders is no longer needed. But until then, the lack of it will unfortunately lead to this worsening.

[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"Don't like?" "Have a grudge against?"

You're describing the feeling that I might have against someone who double parked their car or a coworker that ate my sandwich

That's not what a billionaire is. A billionaire is a fatal threat to the world who holds enough power to starve entire countries, our own country included. It's not about grudges, it's about lives

We aren't talking about overblown and violent reactions. We are talking about resistance against something that already is overblown and violent

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Killing someone should, if at all, always be the last thing not the first.

The correct way to solve this is by stripping them from their power/money not by killing them.

[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And who's gonna strip them of their power? Oh yeah maybe the government can

But oh no, the billionaires can also strip the government of their power too

They are too closely allied for any change to happen. It's all just talk, it's all just theatre

Change can only happen once the people regain their power, and what worked? Peaceful protests? Picket signs? Yeah sure worked well against ICE and company

Why keep holding up an umbrella against knives falling from the sky when you can go fight the cunt that keeps throwing them off the roof of that building?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 0 points 2 days ago

We are rapidly approaching the last thing step.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yet I see many comments about chopping heads with a guillotine. Seems pretty violent to me.

[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but I think that when children get hurt, it just naturally awakens a special kind of rage that I think is justified against whoever's harming them. You're focusing on the wrong thing

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 days ago

Have a happy massacre.

Long live to Luigi Mangione

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

leave no doubt, the filthy rich and disgustingly powerful care about you as much as you care about the bugs you smash against your windshield.

it's not that they want to kill us. its that they're indifferent to our suffering and inevitable demise as long as they continue reaching their destinations.

now tell me, don't you believe we have a right to protect ourselves against such indifference?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it’s not that they want to kill us. its that they’re indifferent to our suffering and inevitable demise as long as they continue reaching their destinations.

They are basically the indifferent beings with limitless power who destroy humanity through indifference from Lovecraftian mythology.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago

Killing people is always bad, always the wrong solution.

What a stupid fucking take. Is it embarrassing being that dumb?