this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
978 points (99.7% liked)

Not The Onion

22998 readers
2169 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like he wants the wealth tax to be so high that there is no "wealth" left. 'Cause no wealth means no mass surveillance.

That's what he is advocating for . . Right? /s

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The wealth tax doesn't need to be so high that there's no wealth left.

Just about neck level or so.

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm thinking in that persons case, it certainly does.