this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
36 points (92.9% liked)

Asklemmy

55084 readers
549 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A few that I can think of: Rockhill, Smith, Enfu, Boer, Manoel, Foster, Cockshott, Shaikh.

We lost Losurdo pretty recently, and he was IMO one of the best of the last few decades.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Damn RIP. I didn't know Losurdo passed away.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, so living in our hearts counts?

[–] helix@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

In our hearts...

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

this is a tough one but I'm going to say karl marx

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

sorry to break the bad news but he's not alive anymore

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

there's no way obama would be that happy reviving marx. lol

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what they want you to think !

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This will be controversial given the "that's not true communism according to my 170 year old theory book" crowd that sometimes permeates western leftists like a disgusting plague; but Xi Jinping. He's released 6 or so books, he has a literal Doctorate in Marxism, and has documented China's success and failures in its strive towards communism, including very good answers for every single criticism western Do-Nothing marxists have towards China's Dengist reforms and their incredible economic success.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd argue SWCCfaNE is closer to classical Marxist economics than the Gang of Four era. Marketization of underdeveloped industries helps socialize production, which can be kept in check through proletarian state ownership of the commanding heights of industry, finance, etc. This accelerates the transition between capitalism and communism, towards collectivized production and distribution.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Xi Jinping, Cheng Enfu, Wang Binglin, Tian Pengying, Xie Fusheng

Honestly it's such a broad area of research that naming a single greatest is impossible due to each researcher having their own speciality.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm a fan of Cheng Enfu and Roland Boer. If you asked a few years ago I would have added Domenico Losurdo, but sadly he has passed.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No😭😭😭😭

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As much as I love Parenti (may he rest in peace), I wouldn't classify him as a Marxist scholar, more of a "pro-Marxist."

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's called "popularisator", someone who's great at explaining complicated concepts and/or processes. Though he did had some great materialist analysis of various topics which does place him as the marxist scholar after all i think. Just not the Lenin or Mao caliber.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

That's a valid way of viewing him. He's absolutely a vital figure, and probably the one I recommend the most for liberals due to his unique skills as an orator and in conveying Marxist ideas. My point was more that I don't see him as I see Losurdo, for example, nor one of the actual revolutionaries in AES countries (who are less purely scholars and more theoreticians and practicians).

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

For real tho Annie McClanahan perhaps? I would have said Joshua Clover although sadly he just passed within the past year or so.

It's hard to sometimes decipher what scholar is or is not working with Marxism since it's been so influential to so many academic fields

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

not sure of "greatest living" but Kohei Saito seems decent

https://archive.org/download/18965473/Kohei%20Saito.%20Marx%20in%20the%20Anthropocene.pdf

I thought Karl Popper's insight's worth a read/look, but he was and then was not a fan (he dead though)

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I only know video hosters, so

#1 Nathan Rich
#2 J.T. Chapman
#3 Ben Norton

Not really scholars, but they have interesting insights.

[–] piezoelectron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Surprised that no one's mentioned David Harvey, who's perhaps the best teacher for those new to Marxism

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

im adding Hardt and negri, and jodi dean.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I know he's not marxist but perhaps Ε½iΕΎek?

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

idk maybe how he constantly says right wing shit?

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

dude chill, i was asking because i don't know anything about him

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Read the article above. He's very anti-immigrant, and anti-communist.

[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just listened to him for five minutes and felt he was wasting my time. I like people who pick a topic and then follow through with it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I've seen/heard him say interesting and thought-provoking things.

But yeah, most of the time it seems like he just likes hearing himself speak.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Capitalism’s Court Jester: Slavoj Ε½iΕΎek

This neoliberal prankster is thus the epitome of a radical recuperator. He cultivates and markets the appearance of radicality in order to recuperate potentially radical elements in society, particularly young people and students, within the pro-imperialist anti-communist fold. This is precisely why he is the most famous β€˜Marxist’ in the capitalist world, festooned by the likes of a journal linked to the engine of U.S. imperialism. His mantra is nothing but an opportunistic perversion of the closing lines of The Communist Manifesto: β€œCultural consumers of the pro-Western world uniteβ€”and buy my next book, or movie, or crossover product, or whatever, and so on, and so on!”

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zizek is more of a Hegelian by his own admission, and is essentially an "imperialist from the left."

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Interesting