this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
304 points (91.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41064 readers
4694 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

I really enjoyed my stint as a juror. Never tried to weasel out of it either.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 2 points 5 minutes ago

It's an important civic duty. For every opportunity to find Luigi did nothing wrong, there is a terrible case.

I had a friend who had a 8 month jury stint over a infamous and grusome child murder. They had to review detailed forensic evidence. He had to go to therapy for panic attacks for years.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago

Fartmaxxing.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is genius, though personally I'd the eggs into egg salad and add plentiful fried onions.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

here we didn't get to bring our own meals. We weren't even allowed to go home or keep our phones at all

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 51 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

I've only served on jury duty once, and it was kinda fucked up. Child abuse case, and we were all kinda on the fence leaning toward defendant was guilty, but the evidence presented was just absolute dogshit. Lots of reasonable doubts.

Found the dude not guilty on the premise that we'd rather let a guilty piece of shit off the hook than risk convicting someone who's innocent, but it felt real fuckin icky to give that verdict over what was most likely just a lazy investigation by the cops.

Hope the kid turned out okay... must have absolutely zero faith in the legal system because of that.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You wouldn't believe the amount of cases we shelve because cops are incompetent. Or maybe you will if you know anything about cops.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 46 minutes ago

Sorry you had to deal with that. It sounds like you did the job properly, as shitty as that is.

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As one of those kids, he'll probably turn out okay. As a juror, it's better to let a piece of shit go free than make an innocent person rot in jail.

When the kid grows up I would almost guarantee that he would make the same decision.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

it's better to let a piece of shit go free than make an innocent person rot in jail.

In both cases the piece of shit goes free. Which is somehow really hard for people to understand.

[–] autriyo@feddit.org 8 points 6 hours ago

I don't remember the name, but some lawyer on YouTube explained that exactly the problem you all had, is why he doesn't struggle defending someone who is "obviously" guilty.

You can't really know that right of the bat. You need at least some good evidence. Basically he is making sure that all the other people do their job correctly.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago

You did the right thing. It's also important that cops and prosecutors do their job and stop relying on horrible accusations to be enough to convict anyone they want.

We're close enough to the French https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror as it is. I still think Al Franken really didn't do anything seriously wrong.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 134 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I am going to make everyone suffer because I have to participate in society 😇

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (11 children)

I've never understand why people always complain about jury duty in particular. I've never been called, but I think it sounds like an interesting experience.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 26 minutes ago

It’s because they don’t value your time.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

if you are willing to sit a juror pool for like several days straight, where they spends hours questioning each juror of why they can and cannot serve. its really annoying and time consuming, and people have jobs. most of the people in my area can afford to take time off, majority of the juror pool i was in was tech/programmer. its very anxiety inducing if you dont want to be there.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Wait, so you have to take vacation days for jury duty? Your employer doesn't have to give you leave? That's fucked up lol. Every time I think the US couldn't be more fucked than it already is, I get proven wrong lol.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

You reminded me of an excellent quote: "the USA is not a first world country. It's 50 third world countries in a trench coat".

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah do they not legally have to pay you for it in the us or something? That's messed up

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 25 minutes ago

They pay you but it’s like enough for lunch.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 52 minutes ago

In most (maybe all) states, you do get paid by the state, but it is something hilariously low. In my state it is $20 a day I believe, which is not much above the minimum hourly wage for my area.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

i sat in one last sept, it was very boring and very annoying if you a job. basically the 1st 2 days is roll call like 200+people, and they may or may not take "excuses' to be excluded from jd. if you are selected you have to sit in a courtroom usually 8am sharp and then sit there for 7+hrs listening to peoples "biases" of why they can or cannot be in the jury(with breaks). they will sus you out if you try the JD nullfication tactic, and they might end up choosing you. its incredibally annoying. this went on for 3-4 days, because people were trying to get out of jury duty( they have to vet every single person they call to the stand. its usually they choose 12 main jurors and 3-6 alternates, the only ones that usually are excused are people who are old(70+), have a disability, or thier jobs require so much time commiment they cant afford to be jury duty. almost everyone in my Jury pool were in tech, so mostly can afford to have time off, only a few one cant speak or understand English clearly(chinese immigrant), one is DEAF or very hearing impaired.lawyers, LEOs are also excluded mostly.

then they go through biases like someone is too emotional, or some is a former lawyer from another country (germany) which she gave the reason why a jury is inefficient, she was excused. 1 chick tried her hardest of being A SJW(organizing/prostesting,,,etc).

some people cant afford to be in a jury because of money. In a HCOL thats less likely.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Mostly it's money related. Some people literally cannot afford to attend jury duty because of how little compensation there is for their time; like in my area, if it takes two weeks you get compensated $4.75 an hour compared to a full time job which is $13.50 below minimum wage ($18.25).

I also think it would be cool and would like to attend, but then I wouldn't be able to pay rent if it goes on too long.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

in the west its only 15/day, if you are on the juror pool. and it was 3-4 days, i make more than that in half of a shift.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 10 hours ago

Yup, here you get minimum wage which is only slightly over federal.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I wouldn't mind doing it. I was actually summoned twice in a two year period, but my stupid ADHD ass neglected to show up because I was really bad at time management back then. They have not summoned me since :(.

[–] xylol@leminal.space 12 points 11 hours ago

Yeah you get to sit in a lobby for 3 hours, then the judge calls you in to tell you to be back in an hour after lunch. The you come back and sit a few more hours until they call you back in to tell you what time to be back the next day

[–] errer@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

I served in a jury once on a criminal case, we found the defendant not guilty and got to see him be freed. That felt pretty nice to be a part of that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 46 points 14 hours ago

why is society so shit

[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

Pretty easy to get out of, right? I'm sure no prosecutor would keep you if you stated plainly that you detest cops and would never trust a word that comes out of their snouts. I've also heard of people claiming to have biases against all races but their own just to get out of jury duty, although at least once, I've heard of a judge asking jurists who made such claims for proof of past statements along those lines or be slapped with contempt of court charges. Not sure proclaiming to be a racist is the direction I would go in, but to each their own, I suppose.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, you keep all that secret, manage to get on the jury anyway, then vote not guilty no matter what.

Unless it's a civil case. Then you just automatically rule in favor of whichever party has less money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doom@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ya'll if you don't want to serve just tell the court you know what jury nullification is and ask to be dismissed. No need for biological warfare.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

In some places, telling potential jurors about jury nullification is considered juror tampering.

It's better to phrase it differently without actually saying the words "jury nullification". Something like, "I would vote not guilty if the law is unjust."

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago

1 Angry Man

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

I served once, and it was an interesting experience, I learned to trust the court system more than I did before, at least for the civil trial I sat.

Years later I was on call for selection. During the selection process I agreed, when the lawyer asked, that false imprisonment needed to mean they couldn't leave, i.e. they were locked up. That was enough to eliminate me. I didn't want to be on a criminal trial that sounded like it was going to last weeks.

In short, it's easy enough to get out of serving, there's no reason to be a jerk.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›