this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
683 points (98.4% liked)

memes

22211 readers
3841 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I mean what did you expect? Writing and art can be done entirely in software. Manual labor needs robotics, which needs to be AI-powered for adaptability anyway.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Actually, nobody is doing the physical labor so that the company can present itself as low cost for future investors.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I really don't understand how people thought that AI was going to be able to do physical labor for them. Robotics can do some level of physical labor however most physical labor still requires a human being as we are years and decades away from any sort of robotic entity with any sort of llm or AI or whatever intelligence or even just a basic programming script being able to perform most jobs. My job myself will never be replaced in my lifetime I probably have another 15 to 20 years of doing what I'm doing right now and I can pretty much guarantee that there will not be any sort of advancement in labor by robotics or AI that could complete the job that I do.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The other thing is solving on-the-job issues that crop up like the previous plumber not knowing their ass from a hole in the ground, and now you need to figure out how to deal with their cursed contraption. Good luck little robot! Hope you figure it out in such a way that the homeowner doesn't sue your AI startup into buying them a full house Reno, or the value of the house pre-poonado.

I'm also in the same boat as you. My job is in the field and is already heavily automated but that's not doing a damn thing for replacing me. The hard part is understanding a multivariate system and it's safety critical. Humans can manage it but AI can't yet, and probably never fully will.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

They're not judging anything, they're visualizing a future where their needs are met based on trends in tech. They just forgot we live in a world where the rich's needs are met instead.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Turns out the physical tasks that hadn't been automated by 2015 were really hard and generally risky if you get them wrong. The risks of generating slop are minimal.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Folding laundry is a task that has stumped robots since 1990.

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at google’s last robots, they have them tying plastic bags and screwing light bulbs.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think a lot of those robots are very expensive and liable to break the bones of onlookers when they go wrong...

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think they’re for sale, more of a research thing right now, but the point is that the technology is there, it just hasn’t reached the market yet.

As for being liable to break the bones of onlookers… This is always the argument that comes up for some reason, same as self-driving cars. In reality, I’ve known my fair share of humans who are liable to break the bones of onlookers when things go wrong too.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, those things will make it eventually too, I don't mean to imply they won't. Just emphasising that we can see the difficulty of the task still in those current efforts.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

They also get pretty banged up from working in real life situations like factories so they're expected to not be that cheap with replacement parts.